Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Toyota C-HR

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota C-HR Discontinued model
Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
ZAR 570,000 last listed
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 499,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 134 kW 🔧 190 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Toyota C-HR: the short answer

All-New CX-5 and C-HR are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context All-New CX-5: announced from ZAR 570,000 · C-HR: last listed from ZAR 429,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification All-New CX-5 C-HR
Maximum Power All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm C-HR134 kW
Maximum Torque All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm C-HR190 Nm
Engine Size All-New CX-52488 cc C-HR1987 cc
Combined Fuel Economy All-New CX-513.2 km/l C-HR19.2 km/l
Ground Clearance All-New CX-5205 mm C-HR160 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality

C-HR

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

C-HR

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec All-New CX-5 C-HR
Model Introduced Year 2026 2023
Generation Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa Second generation on TNGA-C platform – hybrid-only in SA
Facelift History All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies All-new second generation launched in SA in 2023
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current 2024
Body Style SUV 5-door Crossover SUV
Model Year 2026 2021
Production Status upcoming discontinued
Segment Medium SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle 5-door Crossover SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1500 kg
Spec All-New CX-5 C-HR
Length 4690 mm 4390 mm
Width 1860 mm 1796 mm
Height 1695 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2640 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 160 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 200 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 43 l
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l 377 l
Kerb Weight 1629 kg 1500 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2190 kg 1930 kg
Payload Capacity 561 kg 430 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 1 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 1007 mm 993 mm
Rear Headroom 1020 mm 946 mm
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1030 mm
Rear Legroom 1012 mm 881 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This All-New CX-5 and C-HR comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: All-New CX-5 52 vs C-HR 53.

Efficiency index: All-New CX-5 52 vs C-HR 78.

Safety-equipment index: All-New CX-5 98 vs C-HR 98.

Practicality index: All-New CX-5 66 vs C-HR 57.

Ownership-cover index: All-New CX-5 not separately scored vs C-HR 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

All-New CX-5 leads by 1 points

All-New CX-5 and C-HR are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 68 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 82% source coverage
68
#1 Evidence leader

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Leads by 1 points
67
#2

C-HR

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 53
Efficiency 78
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C-HR +1 Efficiency C-HR +26 Safety Level Practicality All-New CX-5 +9

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

C-HR

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 78/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda All-New CX-5 leads the specification evidence index with 68 pts vs 67 pts for C-HR

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, All-New CX-5 leads. However, C-HR may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

All-New CX-5 vs C-HR questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.