Toyota Agya vs Suzuki Celerio

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota Agya Discontinued model
Toyota Agya in South Africa

Toyota Agya

1.0 XR CVT Petrol CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 229,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 51 kW 🔧 91 Nm ⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Suzuki Celerio in South Africa

Suzuki Celerio

1.0 GL AMT Petrol 5-Speed AMT Current
ZAR 225,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 49 kW 🔧 89 Nm ⛽ 23.8 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Agya
Fuel Economy Celerio
🛡 Safety Celerio
📦 Practicality Celerio
🔑 Ownership Celerio
Recorded price context Agya: last listed from ZAR 189,900 · Celerio: current from ZAR 188,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Agya Celerio
Maximum Power 51 kW @ 6000 rpm 49 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque 91 Nm @ 3600 rpm 89 Nm @ 3500 rpm
Engine Size 998 cc 998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 18.0 km/l 23.8 km/l
Ground Clearance 155 mm 170 mm
Boot / Load Bay 235 l 295 l
Airbags 4 6 SRS airbags
Kerb Weight 870 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 3 5 years / 200 000 km

= leads in this spec

Archived vehicles remain available for comparison. Verified specs stay visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Celerio has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Agya remains close.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Agya +1 pts
Efficiency Celerio +16 pts
Safety Celerio +16 pts
Practicality Celerio +2 pts
Ownership Celerio +17 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Agya

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Performance
Catalogue-index leader

Celerio

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Agya

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Celerio

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Agya Celerio
Model Introduced Year 2015 2017
Generation Second generation Agya for South Africa Second-generation Celerio on HEARTECT lightweight platform; global redesign retained the proven K10C engine while reducing weight and improving structural rigidity; the platform is shared with the S-Presso
Facelift History Updated with refreshed styling and features First generation introduced in SA around 2015; second-generation HEARTECT-platform Celerio launched in SA in 2017; ongoing specification updates adding Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity; currently sold model reflects 2022 specification updates
Tare Mass Kg 870 kg 805-830 kg
Facelift Launched Since Not confirmed 2022
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Hatchback
Color Note Not confirmed Solid White, Pearl Midnight Black, Metallic Silky Silver, Sizzling Red, Speedy Blue
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed published
Segment Not confirmed Hatchback
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Hatchback
Spec Agya Celerio
Length 3760 mm 3695 mm
Width 1665 mm 1655 mm
Height 1520 mm 1555 mm
Wheelbase 2455 mm 2435 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 l 32 l
Boot/Cargo Space 235 l 295 l
Kerb Weight 870 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1265 kg 1240 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Minimum Turning Radius 4.7 m 4.7 m
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 400 kg
Number of Rows Not confirmed 2 rows
Doors Not confirmed 5 doors
Front Headroom Not confirmed 980 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed 972 mm
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1040 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed 895 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Celerio leads by 9 points

Celerio has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Agya remains close.

Index leader 60 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 88% source coverage
60
#1 Index leader

Celerio

88% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 86 Check Performance 21
Performance 21
Efficiency 86
Safety 86
Practicality 55
Ownership 60
Leads by 9 points
51
#2

Agya

79% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 70 Check Performance 22
Performance 22
Efficiency 70
Safety 70
Practicality 53
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Agya +1 Efficiency Celerio +16 Safety Celerio +16 Practicality Celerio +2 Ownership Celerio +17

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Celerio

Performance 21/100
Efficiency 86/100
Safety 86/100
Practicality 55/100
Ownership 60/100

Agya

Performance 22/100
Efficiency 70/100
Safety 70/100
Practicality 53/100
Ownership 43/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Suzuki Celerio leads the catalogue index with 60 pts vs 51 pts for Agya

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Celerio leads. However, Agya may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Agya and Celerio comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Agya 22 vs Celerio 21.

Efficiency index: Agya 70 vs Celerio 86.

Safety-equipment index: Agya 70 vs Celerio 86.

Practicality index: Agya 53 vs Celerio 55.

Ownership-cover index: Agya 43 vs Celerio 60.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.