Toyota Agya vs Suzuki Celerio

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota Agya Discontinued model
Toyota Agya in South Africa

Toyota Agya

1.0 XR CVT Petrol CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 229,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 51 kW 🔧 91 Nm ⛽ 18.0 km/l
VS
Suzuki Celerio in South Africa

Suzuki Celerio

1.0 GL AMT Petrol 5-Speed AMT Current
ZAR 225,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 49 kW 🔧 89 Nm ⛽ 23.8 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Agya vs Suzuki Celerio: the short answer

Celerio has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Agya remains close.

Recorded price context Agya: last listed from ZAR 189,900 · Celerio: current from ZAR 188,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Agya Celerio
Maximum Power Agya51 kW @ 6000 rpm Celerio49 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Agya91 Nm @ 3600 rpm Celerio89 Nm @ 3500 rpm
Engine Size Agya998 cc Celerio998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Agya18.0 km/l Celerio23.8 km/l
Ground Clearance Agya155 mm Celerio170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Agya

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

Celerio

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Agya

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Celerio

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Agya Celerio
Model Introduced Year 2015 2017
Generation Second generation Agya for South Africa Second-generation Celerio on HEARTECT lightweight platform; global redesign retained the proven K10C engine while reducing weight and improving structural rigidity; the platform is shared with the S-Presso
Facelift History Updated with refreshed styling and features First generation introduced in SA around 2015; second-generation HEARTECT-platform Celerio launched in SA in 2017; ongoing specification updates adding Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity; currently sold model reflects 2022 specification updates
Facelift Launched Since 2021 2022
Facelift Version Ending 2024 Current
Body Style Hatchback Hatchback
Model Year 2021 2026
Production Status discontinued active
Segment Hatchback Hatchback
Tare Mass Kg 870 kg 805-830 kg
Vehicle Type Hatchback Hatchback
Color Note Not confirmed Solid White, Pearl Midnight Black, Metallic Silky Silver, Sizzling Red, Speedy Blue
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec Agya Celerio
Length 3760 mm 3695 mm
Width 1665 mm 1655 mm
Height 1520 mm 1555 mm
Wheelbase 2455 mm 2435 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 35 l 32 l
Boot/Cargo Space 235 l 295 l
Kerb Weight 870 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1265 kg 1240 kg
Payload Capacity 395 kg 400 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 4.7 m 4.7 m
Front Headroom 983 mm 980 mm
Rear Headroom 951 mm 972 mm
Front Legroom 1048 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 899 mm 895 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Agya and Celerio comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Agya 22 vs Celerio 21.

Efficiency index: Agya 70 vs Celerio 86.

Safety-equipment index: Agya 71 vs Celerio 86.

Practicality index: Agya 51 vs Celerio 55.

Ownership-cover index: Agya 43 vs Celerio 60.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Celerio leads by 10 points

Celerio has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Agya remains close.

Evidence leader 60 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 88% source coverage
60
#1 Evidence leader

Celerio

88% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 86 Check Performance 21
Performance 21
Efficiency 86
Safety 86
Practicality 55
Ownership 60
Leads by 10 points
50
#2

Agya

87% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 71 Check Performance 22
Performance 22
Efficiency 70
Safety 71
Practicality 51
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Agya +1 Efficiency Celerio +16 Safety Celerio +15 Practicality Celerio +4 Ownership Celerio +17

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Celerio

Performance 21/100
Efficiency 86/100
Safety 86/100
Practicality 55/100
Ownership 60/100

Agya

Performance 22/100
Efficiency 70/100
Safety 71/100
Practicality 51/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Suzuki Celerio leads the specification evidence index with 60 pts vs 50 pts for Agya

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Celerio leads. However, Agya may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Agya vs Celerio questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.