Suzuki Across vs BMW iX2

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Across in South Africa

Suzuki Across

1.5 GLX 6AT Petrol Mild Hybrid 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 464,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 76 kW 🔧 137 Nm ⛽ 18.9 km/l
VS
BMW iX2 in South Africa

BMW iX2

eDrive20 M Sport Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,330,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 250 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Across vs BMW iX2: the short answer

iX2 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Across remains close.

Across starts ZAR 950,100 cheaper Across from ZAR 349,900 · iX2 from ZAR 1,300,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Across iX2
Maximum Power Across75.8 kW @ 6000 rpm iX2150 kW
Maximum Torque Across136.8 Nm @ 4400 rpm iX2250 Nm
Engine Size Across1462 cc iX2Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy Across18.9 km/l iX2Not Applicable
Ground Clearance Across210 mm iX2190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Across

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

iX2

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Across

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

iX2

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Across iX2
Model Introduced Year 2026 2024
Generation First South African generation of the current Across First-generation U10 electric coupé-style compact SUV; current South African offering is eDrive20 only.
Facelift History All-new March 2026 South African launch model; no facelift yet U10 is the first iX2 generation; the eDrive20 joined the South African range in July 2026.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-door compact SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment C-segment family SUV Premium SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1200-1250 kg -
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Car
Spec Across iX2
Length 4360 mm 4554 mm
Width 1795 mm 1845 mm
Height 1655 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase 2600 mm 2692 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 333 l 525 l
Kerb Weight Not Officially Disclosed 1960 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 2460 kg
Payload Capacity 460 kg 575 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 750 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.8 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1010 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 982 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1042 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 935 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Across and iX2 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Across 34 vs iX2 59.

Efficiency index: Across 76 vs iX2 90.

Safety-equipment index: Across 91 vs iX2 92.

Practicality index: Across 62 vs iX2 63.

Ownership-cover index: Across not separately scored vs iX2 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

iX2 leads by 11 points

iX2 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Across remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 69% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

iX2

69% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 59
Performance 59
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 63
Leads by 11 points
64
#2

Across

73% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 76
Safety 91
Practicality 62
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance iX2 +25 Efficiency iX2 +14 Safety iX2 +1 Practicality iX2 +1

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

iX2

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 63/100

Across

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 76/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 62/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW iX2 leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 64 pts for Across

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, iX2 leads. However, Across may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Across vs iX2 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.