Suzuki Across vs Mazda CX-3

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Suzuki Across in South Africa

Suzuki Across

1.5 GLX 6AT Petrol Mild Hybrid 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 464,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 76 kW 🔧 137 Nm ⛽ 18.9 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-3 in South Africa

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 551,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 206 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Across vs Mazda CX-3: the short answer

Across and CX-3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Across starts ZAR 90,100 cheaper Across from ZAR 349,900 · CX-3 from ZAR 440,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Across CX-3
Maximum Power Across75.8 kW @ 6000 rpm CX-3115 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Across136.8 Nm @ 4400 rpm CX-3206 Nm @ 2800 rpm
Engine Size Across1462 cc CX-31998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Across18.9 km/l CX-315.9 km/l
Ground Clearance Across210 mm CX-3155 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Across

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

CX-3

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Across

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

CX-3

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Across CX-3
Model Introduced Year 2026 2015
Generation First South African generation of the current Across Current first-generation DK-series Mazda CX-3
Facelift History All-new March 2026 South African launch model; no facelift yet The CX-3 has received successive equipment and design updates since its 2015 debut; Carbon and Individual now sit together at the top of the South African range.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2015
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-door compact SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status On sale Active
Segment C-segment family SUV Compact crossover
Tare Mass Kg 1200-1250 kg 1270 kg
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Spec Across CX-3
Length 4360 mm 4275 mm
Width 1795 mm 1765 mm
Height 1655 mm 1542 mm
Wheelbase 2600 mm 2570 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 48 l
Boot/Cargo Space 333 l 230 l
Payload Capacity 460 kg 465 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.7 m
Kerb Weight - 1270 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) - 1735 kg
Towing Capacity - 850 kg
Front Legroom - 1058 mm
Rear Legroom - 888 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Across and CX-3 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Across 34 vs CX-3 47.

Efficiency index: Across 76 vs CX-3 61.

Safety-equipment index: Across 91 vs CX-3 84.

Practicality index: Across 62 vs CX-3 48.

Ownership-cover index: Across not separately scored vs CX-3 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Across leads by 4 points

Across and CX-3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 64 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 73% source coverage
64
#1 Evidence leader

Across

73% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 76
Safety 91
Practicality 62
Leads by 4 points
60
#2

CX-3

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 47
Performance 47
Efficiency 61
Safety 84
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-3 +13 Efficiency Across +15 Safety Across +7 Practicality Across +14

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Across

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 76/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 62/100

CX-3

Performance 47/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Suzuki Across leads the specification evidence index with 64 pts vs 60 pts for CX-3

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Across leads. However, CX-3 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Across vs CX-3 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.