Suzuki Across vs Mazda All-New CX-5

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Suzuki Across in South Africa

Suzuki Across

1.5 GLX 6AT Petrol Mild Hybrid 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 464,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 76 kW 🔧 137 Nm ⛽ 18.9 km/l
VS
Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
Launch price pending
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Across vs Mazda All-New CX-5: the short answer

Across and All-New CX-5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Across All-New CX-5
Maximum Power Across75.8 kW @ 6000 rpm All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Across136.8 Nm @ 4400 rpm All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size Across1462 cc All-New CX-52488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Across18.9 km/l All-New CX-513.2 km/l
Ground Clearance Across210 mm All-New CX-5205 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Across

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Across

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Across All-New CX-5
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation First South African generation of the current Across Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa
Facelift History All-new March 2026 South African launch model; no facelift yet All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-door compact SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status On sale upcoming
Segment C-segment family SUV Medium SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1200-1250 kg -
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Passenger Vehicle
Spec Across All-New CX-5
Length 4360 mm 4690 mm
Width 1795 mm 1860 mm
Height 1655 mm 1695 mm
Wheelbase 2600 mm 2815 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 205 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 56 l
Boot/Cargo Space 333 l 466 l
Payload Capacity 460 kg 561 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 6.0 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 200 mm
Kerb Weight - 1629 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) - 2190 kg
Towing Capacity - 1500 kg
Front Headroom - 1007 mm
Rear Headroom - 1020 mm
Front Legroom - 1058 mm
Rear Legroom - 1012 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Across and All-New CX-5 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Across 34 vs All-New CX-5 52.

Efficiency index: Across 76 vs All-New CX-5 52.

Safety-equipment index: Across 91 vs All-New CX-5 98.

Practicality index: Across 62 vs All-New CX-5 66.

Ownership-cover index: Across not separately scored vs All-New CX-5 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

All-New CX-5 leads by 4 points

Across and All-New CX-5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 68 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 82% source coverage
68
#1 Evidence leader

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Leads by 4 points
64
#2

Across

73% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 76
Safety 91
Practicality 62
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance All-New CX-5 +18 Efficiency Across +24 Safety All-New CX-5 +7 Practicality All-New CX-5 +4

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

Across

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 76/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 62/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda All-New CX-5 leads the specification evidence index with 68 pts vs 64 pts for Across

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, All-New CX-5 leads. However, Across may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Across vs All-New CX-5 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.