BMW 4 Series Gran Coupé vs Geely E5 EM-i

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

BMW 4 Series Gran Coupé in South Africa

BMW 4 Series Gran Coupé

M440i xDrive Gran Coupé Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,497,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Geely E5 EM-i in South Africa

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 679,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 73 kW 🔧 125 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

BMW 4 Series Gran Coupé vs Geely E5 EM-i: the short answer

4 Series Gran Coupé and E5 EM-i are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

E5 EM-i starts ZAR 396,501 cheaper 4 Series Gran Coupé from ZAR 996,500 · E5 EM-i from ZAR 599,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 4 Series Gran Coupé E5 EM-i
Maximum Power 4 Series Gran Coupé285 kW @ 5800-6500 rpm E5 EM-i73 kW
Maximum Torque 4 Series Gran Coupé500 Nm @ 1800-5000 rpm E5 EM-i125 Nm
Engine Size 4 Series Gran Coupé2998 cc E5 EM-i1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 4 Series Gran Coupé12.5 km/l E5 EM-iNot Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance 4 Series Gran Coupé140 mm E5 EM-i172 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

BMW 4 Series Gran Coupé

M440i xDrive Gran Coupé

Hagalu editorial rating
4.0/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

4 Series Gran Coupé

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

E5 EM-i

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

4 Series Gran Coupé

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

E5 EM-i

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 4 Series Gran Coupé E5 EM-i
Model Introduced Year 2021 2025
Generation G26 four-door Gran Coupé with frameless-door styling and a rear liftback. Current South African model / exact generation number not separately published
Facelift History Current updated G26-generation BMW 4 Series Gran Coupé offered in South Africa; exact equipment follows derivative and production build. No applicable South African facelift history established
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style Sedan SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Premium Sedan Passenger vehicle
Vehicle Type Car SUV
Spec 4 Series Gran Coupé E5 EM-i
Length 1 mm 4740 mm
Width 1 mm 1905 mm
Height 1 mm 1685 mm
Wheelbase 1 mm 2755 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 140 mm 172 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 485 l 528 l
Kerb Weight 1543 kg 1770 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2045 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity 460 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1600 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 1 seats Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows 2 rows Not Officially Disclosed
Doors 4 doors Not Officially Disclosed
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 998 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 943 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1044 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 886 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This 4 Series Gran Coupé and E5 EM-i comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 4 Series Gran Coupé 97 vs E5 EM-i 39.

Efficiency index: 4 Series Gran Coupé 49 vs E5 EM-i 79.

Safety-equipment index: 4 Series Gran Coupé 92 vs E5 EM-i 91.

Practicality index: 4 Series Gran Coupé 48 vs E5 EM-i 71.

Ownership-cover index: 4 Series Gran Coupé not separately scored vs E5 EM-i not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

4 Series Gran Coupé leads by 4 points

4 Series Gran Coupé and E5 EM-i are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 73 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 83% source coverage
73
#1 Evidence leader

4 Series Gran Coupé

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 97 Check Practicality 48
Performance 97
Efficiency 49
Safety 92
Practicality 48
Leads by 4 points
69
#2

E5 EM-i

55% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 79
Safety 91
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance 4 Series Gran Coupé +58 Efficiency E5 EM-i +30 Safety 4 Series Gran Coupé +1 Practicality E5 EM-i +23

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

4 Series Gran Coupé

Performance 97/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 48/100

E5 EM-i

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 79/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW 4 Series Gran Coupé leads the specification evidence index with 73 pts vs 69 pts for E5 EM-i

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, 4 Series Gran Coupé leads. However, E5 EM-i may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
VS
Tayron
Tayron
4 Series Gran Coupé vs Tayron →
4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
VS
H6 GT PHEV
H6 GT PHEV
4 Series Gran Coupé vs H6 GT PHEV →
4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
VS
X1
X1
4 Series Gran Coupé vs X1 →
4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
VS
A-Class
A-Class
4 Series Gran Coupé vs A-Class →
4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
VS
CX-60
CX-60
4 Series Gran Coupé vs CX-60 →
4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
VS
Pajero Sport
Pajero Sport
4 Series Gran Coupé vs Pajero Sport →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Tayron
Tayron
E5 EM-i vs Tayron →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
H6 GT PHEV
H6 GT PHEV
E5 EM-i vs H6 GT PHEV →

4 Series Gran Coupé vs E5 EM-i questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.