Dongfeng 06 vs Ford Puma

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Ford Puma Discontinued model
Dongfeng 06 in South Africa

Dongfeng 06

06 E3 Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 579,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 230 Nm
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 459,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 16.4 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Dongfeng 06 vs Ford Puma: the short answer

06 and Puma are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context 06: current from ZAR 499,000 · Puma: last listed from ZAR 389,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 06 Puma
Maximum Power 06120 kW Puma92 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 06230 Nm Puma170 Nm
Engine Size 06Not Applicable Puma999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 06Not Applicable Puma16.4 km/l
Ground Clearance 06170 mm Puma170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

06

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Puma

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

06

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Puma

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec 06 Puma
Model Introduced Year 2026 2023
Generation Current South African 06 generation First generation Puma in South Africa
Facelift History Current South African launch version; no local facelift announced New model introduced in South Africa
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current 2024
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2021
Production Status active discontinued
Segment Compact Electric SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1325 kg
Spec 06 Puma
Length 4306 mm 4186 mm
Width 1868 mm 1805 mm
Height 1645 mm 1531 mm
Wheelbase 2715 mm 2594 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 170 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 155 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 42 l
Boot/Cargo Space 500 l 456 l
Kerb Weight 500 kg 1325 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 500 kg 1775 kg
Payload Capacity 500 kg 450 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 1010 mm 981 mm
Rear Headroom 980 mm 947 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1047 mm
Rear Legroom 920 mm 898 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This 06 and Puma comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 06 42 vs Puma 40.

Efficiency index: 06 31 vs Puma 64.

Safety-equipment index: 06 88 vs Puma 98.

Practicality index: 06 60 vs Puma 59.

Ownership-cover index: 06 not separately scored vs Puma 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Puma leads by 5 points

06 and Puma are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 61 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 91% source coverage
61
#1 Evidence leader

Puma

91% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 64
Safety 98
Practicality 59
Ownership 43
Leads by 5 points
56
#2

06

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Efficiency 31
Performance 42
Efficiency 31
Safety 88
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance 06 +2 Efficiency Puma +33 Safety Puma +10 Practicality 06 +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Puma

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 64/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 59/100
Ownership 43/100

06

Performance 42/100
Efficiency 31/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Puma leads the specification evidence index with 61 pts vs 56 pts for 06

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Puma leads. However, 06 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

06
06
VS
Jimny
Jimny
06 vs Jimny →
06
06
VS
CX-3
CX-3
06 vs CX-3 →
06
06
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
06 vs Jimny 5-Door →
06
06
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
06 vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV →
06
06
VS
Dashing
Dashing
06 vs Dashing →
06
06
VS
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
06 vs ATTO 2 DM-i →
Puma
PumaDiscontinued
VS
Jimny
Jimny
Puma vs Jimny →
Puma
PumaDiscontinued
VS
CX-3
CX-3
Puma vs CX-3 →

06 vs Puma questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.