Dongfeng 06 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Dongfeng 06 in South Africa

Dongfeng 06

06 E3 Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 579,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 230 Nm
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Exceed 1.5L CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 141 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Dongfeng 06 vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport: the short answer

06 and Outlander Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Outlander Sport starts ZAR 49,010 cheaper 06 from ZAR 499,000 · Outlander Sport from ZAR 449,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 06 Outlander Sport
Maximum Power 06120 kW Outlander Sport77 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 06230 Nm Outlander Sport141 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size 06Not Applicable Outlander Sport1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 06Not Applicable Outlander Sport16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance 06170 mm Outlander Sport193 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

06

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

Outlander Sport

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

06

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Outlander Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 06 Outlander Sport
Model Introduced Year 2026 2025
Generation Current South African 06 generation First South African Outlander Sport generation, Mitsubishi Xforce architecture
Facelift History Current South African launch version; no local facelift announced Introduced locally in January 2025 and replaced ASX.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Compact Electric SUV Compact SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle Passenger vehicle
Spec 06 Outlander Sport
Length 4306 mm 4390 mm
Width 1868 mm 1810 mm
Height 1645 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase 2715 mm 2650 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 170 mm 193 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 155 mm 195 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 42 l
Boot/Cargo Space 500 l 480 l
Kerb Weight 500 kg 1250 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 500 kg 1730 kg
Payload Capacity 500 kg 480 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.2 m
Front Headroom 1010 mm 950 mm
Rear Headroom 980 mm 880 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 920 mm 370 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This 06 and Outlander Sport comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 06 42 vs Outlander Sport 30.

Efficiency index: 06 31 vs Outlander Sport 62.

Safety-equipment index: 06 88 vs Outlander Sport 73.

Practicality index: 06 60 vs Outlander Sport 67.

Ownership-cover index: 06 not separately scored vs Outlander Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Outlander Sport leads by 1 points

06 and Outlander Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 57 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 79% source coverage
57
#1 Evidence leader

Outlander Sport

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 62
Safety 73
Practicality 67
Leads by 1 points
56
#2

06

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Efficiency 31
Performance 42
Efficiency 31
Safety 88
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance 06 +12 Efficiency Outlander Sport +31 Safety 06 +15 Practicality Outlander Sport +7

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Outlander Sport

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 67/100

06

Performance 42/100
Efficiency 31/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Outlander Sport leads the specification evidence index with 57 pts vs 56 pts for 06

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Outlander Sport leads. However, 06 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

06 vs Outlander Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.