iCAUR 03T vs Suzuki Swift Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

iCAUR 03T in South Africa

iCAUR 03T

2WD Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 639,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ Not applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l
VS
Suzuki Swift Sport in South Africa

Suzuki Swift Sport

1.4 Turbo AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 493,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 103 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

iCAUR 03T vs Suzuki Swift Sport: the short answer

03T holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Swift Sport.

Swift Sport starts ZAR 170,000 cheaper 03T from ZAR 639,900 · Swift Sport from ZAR 469,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 03T Swift Sport
Maximum Power 03T135 kW Swift Sport103 kW
Maximum Torque 03T220 Nm Swift Sport230 Nm
Engine Size 03TNot Applicable Swift Sport1373 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 03TNot applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l Swift Sport16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance 03T190 mm Swift Sport0 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

iCAUR 03T

2WD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Suzuki Swift Sport

1.4 Turbo AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

03T

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Swift Sport

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

03T

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Swift Sport

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 03T Swift Sport
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation South African May 2026 local specification sheet for the current 03T generation. Current market generation
Body Style SUV Hatchback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Published active
Segment Electric SUV Hatchback
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Hatchback
Facelift History - Current market specification
Facelift Launched Since - 2026
Facelift Version Ending - Current
Spec 03T Swift Sport
Length 4433 mm 3860 mm
Width 1916 mm 1735 mm
Height 1741 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase 2715 mm 2450 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 190 mm 0 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 165 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity Not applicable — battery electric vehicle 37 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 L rear seats up; 1,238 L with rear seats folded; 40 L rear storage box 265 l
Kerb Weight 1600–1950 kg 920 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2173 kg 1380 kg
Payload Capacity 350–650 kg 460 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.9 m 5.2 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 990 mm 950 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 970 mm 900 mm
Towing Capacity - 500 kg

In depth: how these cars differ

This 03T and Swift Sport comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 03T 51 vs Swift Sport 45.

Efficiency index: 03T 99 vs Swift Sport 62.

Safety-equipment index: 03T 93 vs Swift Sport 67.

Practicality index: 03T 64 vs Swift Sport 42.

Ownership-cover index: 03T not separately scored vs Swift Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

03T leads by 22 points

03T holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Swift Sport.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 22 points
Data 67% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

03T

67% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 99 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 99
Safety 93
Practicality 64
Leads by 22 points
53
#2

Swift Sport

74% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Safety 67 Check Practicality 42
Performance 45
Efficiency 62
Safety 67
Practicality 42
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance 03T +6 Efficiency 03T +37 Safety 03T +26 Practicality 03T +22

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

03T

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 99/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 64/100

Swift Sport

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 67/100
Practicality 42/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index iCAUR 03T leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 53 pts for Swift Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, 03T leads. However, Swift Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

03T vs Swift Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.