Hyundai Tucson vs Hyundai Venue

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Venue
Hyundai Tucson in South Africa

Hyundai Tucson

2.0D AT Executive AWD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 764,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 137 kW 🔧 416 Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
VS
Hyundai Venue in South Africa

Hyundai Venue

1.0T DCT Executive Petrol Automatic Archive reference
ZAR 414,900 last listed
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 88 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 16.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tucson
Fuel Economy Venue
🛡 Safety Tie
📦 Practicality Tucson
🔑 Ownership Tie
Venue starts ZAR 568900 cheaper Tucson from ZAR 568,900 · Venue from ZAR 343,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Tucson Venue
Engine Power 137 kW 88 kW
Torque 416 Nm 172 Nm
Engine Size 1995 cc 998 cc
Claimed Mileage 13.9 km/l 16.4 km/l
Ground Clearance 181 mm 188 mm
Boot / Load Bay 540 l 355 l
Airbags 6 6
Kerb Weight 1720 kg 1180 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 5

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Tucson has a slight advantage, but Venue remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tucson +30 pts
Efficiency Venue +7 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Tucson +9 pts
Ownership Equal

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Tucson

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Venue

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Tucson

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Venue

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Tucson Venue
0–100 km/h 9.5 sec 10.8 sec
0-100 km/h 9.5 sec 10.8 sec
Acceleration 0 100 9.5 sec 10.8 sec
Active Exhaust - Not confirmed
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Naturally Aspirated
Charging Port - Not confirmed
AC Charging Time - Not confirmed
Combined System Power - Not confirmed
Combined System Torque - Not confirmed
Displacement 1995 cc 998 cc
Engine 2.0 R2 CRDi Diesel 1.0 T-GDI Turbo
Engine Config 2.0 R2 CRDi Diesel Not confirmed
Engine Cylinders 4 3
Engine Displacement 1995 cc 998 cc
Engine Displacement Cc 1995 cc 998 cc
Engine Displacement Litres 1995 cc 998 cc
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Power kW 137 kW 88 kW
Engine Torque Nm 416 Nm 172 Nm
Engine Type Diesel Petrol
Engine Type Config Inline Inline
Engine Valves 16 Not confirmed
EV Range - Not confirmed
Fuel Grade Required Diesel Petrol
Induction Turbocharged Not confirmed
Max Power kW 137 kW 88 kW
Max Torque Nm 416 Nm 172 Nm
Maximum Power 137 kW 88 kW
Maximum Torque 416 Nm 172 Nm
Motor Position - Not confirmed
Motor Power - Not confirmed
Motor Torque - Not confirmed
Power 137 kW 88 kW
Power Assisted Steering MDPS Electric Not confirmed
Power 184 bhp Not confirmed
Power kW Rpm 3800 5500
Power @ RPM 3800 5500
System Output - Not confirmed
Top Speed 195 km/h 178 km/h
Torque 416 Nm 172 Nm
Torque Nm Rpm 2000 1500
Torque @ RPM 2000 1500
Turbo Type Turbocharged Not confirmed
Turbocharger Yes Yes
Valves per Cylinder 16 16
Variable Valve Timing Yes Yes
Engine Code - Not confirmed
Cylinder Layout - Not confirmed
Compression Ratio - Not confirmed
Cylinder Bore - Not confirmed
Piston Stroke - Not confirmed
Battery Capacity - Not confirmed
Cylinders 4 3
Motor Type - Not confirmed
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Spec Tucson Venue
360 Degree Camera Yes Yes
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Yes
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Yes
Around View Monitor Yes Yes
Autonomous Emergency Braking Yes No
Auto Lights Yes Yes
Auto Wipers No No
Blind Spot Monitoring Yes Yes
Blind Spot Warning Yes Yes
Cruise Control Yes Yes
Drive Modes Eco / Normal Eco / Normal
Eco Mode Yes Yes
Emergency Braking Yes Not confirmed
EV Mode No No
Lane Departure Warning Yes Yes
Lane Keep Assist Yes Yes
Parking Distance Sensors Front & Rear Not confirmed
Parking Sensor Front & Rear Not confirmed
Parking Sensors Front & Rear Front & Rear
Pre-Collision System Yes Not confirmed
Rain Sensor Wipers No Not confirmed
Rear View Camera Yes Yes
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Yes Yes
Rear View Camera Yes Not confirmed
Reverse Camera Yes Yes
Reverse Camera Type Yes Not confirmed
Reversing Camera Yes Not confirmed
Sport Mode No No
Surround View Camera Yes Yes
Traffic Sign Recognition No No
Rear Parking Sensors Front & Rear Not confirmed
Driver Fatigue Alert - Not confirmed
Auto Highbeam - Not confirmed
Park Assist - Not confirmed
Forward Collision Warning - Not confirmed

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tucson leads by 8 points

Tucson has a slight advantage, but Venue remains highly competitive.

Winner 72 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 91% confidence
72
#1 Winner

Tucson

91% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 56
Performance 69
Efficiency 56
Safety 92
Practicality 73
Ownership 65
Leads by 8 points
64
#2

Venue

88% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 63
Safety 92
Practicality 64
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tucson +30 Efficiency Venue +7 Safety Level Practicality Tucson +9 Ownership Level

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tucson

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 73/100
Ownership 65/100

Venue

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 63/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 64/100
Ownership 65/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Hyundai Tucson wins with 72 pts vs 64 pts for Venue

In structured scoring, Tucson emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Venue may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tucson edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Tucson 56 vs Venue 63. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Tucson 92, Venue 92. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Tucson 65, Venue 65. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Tucson 73, Venue 64. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Tucson 69, Venue 39. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tucson edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tucson scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Tucson and Venue in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Tucson scores 69 vs 39.

Efficiency: Tucson scores 56 vs 63.

Safety: Tucson scores 92 vs 92.

Practicality: Tucson scores 73 vs 64.

Ownership: Tucson scores 65 vs 65.

Final structured scoring gives Tucson the advantage in this comparison.