Chery Tiggo 4 Pro vs Mahindra XUV700

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Chery Tiggo 4 Pro in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Pro

LiT MT 1.5L Petrol Manual
ZAR 269,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV700 in South Africa

Mahindra XUV700

AX7L BE Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 627,899 ex-showroom
⚡ 149 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance XUV700
Fuel Economy Tiggo 4 Pro
🛡 Safety Tiggo 4 Pro
📦 Practicality XUV700
🔑 Ownership Tiggo 4 Pro
Tiggo 4 Pro starts ZAR 495199 cheaper Tiggo 4 Pro from ZAR 269,900 · XUV700 from ZAR 495,199

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Tiggo 4 Pro XUV700
Engine Power 83 kW 149 kW
Torque 138 Nm 380 Nm
Engine Size 1.5 cc 1997 cc
Claimed Mileage 14.3 km/l 13 km/l
Ground Clearance 180 mm 200 mm
Boot / Load Bay - 240 l
Airbags Multiple airbags 7
Kerb Weight - 2040 kg
Seating Capacity 5 7
Warranty 5 Year / 150 000 km 5 years / 150 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Tiggo 4 Pro and XUV700 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance XUV700 +31 pts
Efficiency Tiggo 4 Pro +4 pts
Safety Tiggo 4 Pro +13 pts
Practicality XUV700 +9 pts
Ownership Tiggo 4 Pro +3 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Tiggo 4 Pro

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

XUV700

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Tiggo 4 Pro

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

XUV700

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Tiggo 4 Pro XUV700
Model Introduced Year 2024 -
Generation Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Pro range Current local listing
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2024 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active Active
Segment SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Tiggo 4 Pro XUV700
Ground Clearance 180 mm 200 mm
Wheelbase 2610 mm 2750 mm
Length 4318 mm 4695 mm
Width 1831 mm 1890 mm
Height 1662 mm 1755 mm
Kerb Weight - 2040 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight - -
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space - 240 l
Towing Capacity 1300 kg -
Front Track Width - -
Rear Track Width - -
Turning Radius - -
Load Bed Length - 240 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded - -
Number of Doors 5 -
Max Payload - -
Boot Volume - 240 l
Doors 5 -
Seats 5 7
Fuel Tank Capacity - 60 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg - -
Ground Clearance Max 180 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance Min 180 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 180 mm 200 mm
Height Mm 1662 mm 1755 mm
Length Mm 4318 mm 4695 mm
Loadbox Length Mm - 240 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg - -
Cargo Volume - 240 l
Tare Mass Kg - 2040 kg
Turning Circle - -
Turning Circle M - -
Width Mm 1831 mm 1890 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

XUV700 leads by 5 points

Both Tiggo 4 Pro and XUV700 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 60 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 85% confidence
60
#1 Winner

XUV700

85% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 67 Check Ownership 44
Performance 67
Efficiency 53
Safety 62
Practicality 67
Ownership 44
Leads by 5 points
55
#2

Tiggo 4 Pro

70% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 75 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 57
Safety 75
Practicality 58
Ownership 47
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance XUV700 +31 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Pro +4 Safety Tiggo 4 Pro +13 Practicality XUV700 +9 Ownership Tiggo 4 Pro +3

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

XUV700

Performance 67/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 62/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 44/100

Tiggo 4 Pro

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 75/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 47/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Mahindra XUV700 wins with 60 pts vs 55 pts for Tiggo 4 Pro

In structured scoring, XUV700 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Tiggo 4 Pro may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the XUV700 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Tiggo 4 Pro 57 vs XUV700 53. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Tiggo 4 Pro 75, XUV700 62. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Tiggo 4 Pro 47, XUV700 44. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Tiggo 4 Pro 58, XUV700 67. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Tiggo 4 Pro 36, XUV700 67. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The XUV700 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The XUV700 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Tiggo 4 Pro and XUV700 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Tiggo 4 Pro scores 36 vs 67.

Efficiency: Tiggo 4 Pro scores 57 vs 53.

Safety: Tiggo 4 Pro scores 75 vs 62.

Practicality: Tiggo 4 Pro scores 58 vs 67.

Ownership: Tiggo 4 Pro scores 47 vs 44.

Final structured scoring gives XUV700 the advantage in this comparison.