Jetour T1 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Jetour T1 in South Africa

Jetour T1

Odyssey 2.0TD+7DCT 4WD Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 634,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 375 Nm ⛽ 11.1 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT Petrol Current
ZAR 279,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Jetour T1 vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross: the short answer

T1 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tiggo 4 Cross remains close.

Tiggo 4 Cross starts ZAR 235,000 cheaper T1 from ZAR 514,900 · Tiggo 4 Cross from ZAR 279,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification T1 Tiggo 4 Cross
Maximum Power T1180 kW @ 5500 rpm Tiggo 4 Cross83 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque T1375 Nm Tiggo 4 Cross170 Nm
Engine Size T11998 cc Tiggo 4 Cross1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy T111.1 km/l Tiggo 4 Cross14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance T1190 mm Tiggo 4 Cross180 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

T1

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Tiggo 4 Cross

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

T1

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 4 Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec T1 Tiggo 4 Cross
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation Current local listing Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross range
Facelift History Not listed by current South African source page. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg 3808 kg -
Model Year Current 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1811 kg 1309 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec T1 Tiggo 4 Cross
Length 4705 mm 4351 mm
Width 1967 mm 1831 mm
Height 1840 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2800 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 190 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 190 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 574 l 340 l
Kerb Weight 1811 kg 1309 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2208 kg 1684 kg
Payload Capacity 375 kg 375 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 1300 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1030 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 1010 mm 975 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 930 mm 930 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This T1 and Tiggo 4 Cross comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: T1 77 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 38.

Efficiency index: T1 44 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 56.

Safety-equipment index: T1 93 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 91.

Practicality index: T1 67 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 55.

Ownership-cover index: T1 not separately scored vs Tiggo 4 Cross not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

T1 leads by 12 points

T1 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tiggo 4 Cross remains close.

Evidence leader 72 /100
Lead 12 points
Data 68% source coverage
72
#1 Evidence leader

T1

68% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 44
Performance 77
Efficiency 44
Safety 93
Practicality 67
Leads by 12 points
60
#2

Tiggo 4 Cross

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance T1 +39 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Cross +12 Safety T1 +2 Practicality T1 +12

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

T1

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 44/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 67/100

Tiggo 4 Cross

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Jetour T1 leads the specification evidence index with 72 pts vs 60 pts for Tiggo 4 Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, T1 leads. However, Tiggo 4 Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

T1
T1
VS
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
T1 vs ZS Pro →
T1
T1
VS
T-Cross
T-Cross
T1 vs T-Cross →
T1
T1
VS
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
T1 vs Jolion Pro →
T1
T1
VS
Seltos
Seltos
T1 vs Seltos →
T1
T1
VS
UNI-S
UNI-S
T1 vs UNI-S →
T1
T1
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
T1 vs Tiggo 7 Pro →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
Tiggo 4 Cross vs ZS Pro →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
T-Cross
T-Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross vs T-Cross →

T1 vs Tiggo 4 Cross questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.