Volkswagen T-Cross vs Hyundai Venue

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Venue Discontinued model
Volkswagen T-Cross in South Africa

Volkswagen T-Cross

1.0 TSI 85kW R-Line DSG Petrol Current
ZAR 548,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 175 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Hyundai Venue in South Africa

Hyundai Venue

1.0T DCT Executive Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 414,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 88 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 16.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Volkswagen T-Cross vs Hyundai Venue: the short answer

T-Cross and Venue are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context T-Cross: current from ZAR 399,900 · Venue: last listed from ZAR 343,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification T-Cross Venue
Maximum Power T-Cross85 kW Venue88 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque T-Cross175 Nm Venue172 Nm @ 1500 rpm
Engine Size T-Cross1000 cc Venue998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy T-Cross18.2 km/l Venue16.4 km/l
Ground Clearance T-Cross188 mm Venue188 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai Venue 1.0T DCT Executive

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

T-Cross

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Venue

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

T-Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Venue

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec T-Cross Venue
Model Introduced Year 2020 2019
Generation First generation T-Cross on MQB-A0 platform First generation Venue — the global model adapted for SA with minor market-specific changes; no second-gen yet in SA
Facelift History Facelift in 2024 with updated features Launched in SA in 2019; subtle updates to safety and infotainment tech followed in subsequent years
Facelift Launched Since 2024 2019
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red Not confirmed
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Not confirmed
Drivetrain Note 4x2 configuration for the local line-up Not confirmed
Model Year Current Not confirmed
Production Status published Not confirmed
Segment SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg 1291 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec T-Cross Venue
Length 4135 mm 4040 mm
Width 1760 mm 1770 mm
Height 1573 mm 1619 mm
Wheelbase 2551 mm 2520 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 188 mm 188 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 l 45 l
Boot/Cargo Space 385 l 355 l
Kerb Weight 1291 kg 1180 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1750 kg 1670 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 10.6 m Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This T-Cross and Venue comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: T-Cross 34 vs Venue 39.

Efficiency index: T-Cross 69 vs Venue 64.

Safety-equipment index: T-Cross 81 vs Venue 87.

Practicality index: T-Cross 60 vs Venue 64.

Ownership-cover index: T-Cross not separately scored vs Venue 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Venue leads by 3 points

T-Cross and Venue are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 63 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 89% source coverage
63
#1 Evidence leader

Venue

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 64
Safety 87
Practicality 64
Ownership 65
Leads by 3 points
60
#2

T-Cross

63% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 81 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 69
Safety 81
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Venue +5 Efficiency T-Cross +5 Safety Venue +6 Practicality Venue +4

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Venue

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 64/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 64/100
Ownership 65/100

T-Cross

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 69/100
Safety 81/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Venue leads the specification evidence index with 63 pts vs 60 pts for T-Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Venue leads. However, T-Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

T-Cross vs Venue questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.