Lexus RZ vs Ford Tourneo Custom

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Lexus RZ in South Africa

Lexus RZ

RZ 550e F SPORT Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,977,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 300 kW 🔧 269 Nm
VS
Ford Tourneo Custom in South Africa

Ford Tourneo Custom

2.0L SWB Titanium X 8AT Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,278,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 390 Nm ⛽ 13.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Lexus RZ vs Ford Tourneo Custom: the short answer

RZ has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tourneo Custom remains close.

Tourneo Custom starts ZAR 607,100 cheaper RZ from ZAR 1,682,600 · Tourneo Custom from ZAR 1,075,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification RZ Tourneo Custom
Maximum Power RZ300 kW Tourneo Custom125 kW
Maximum Torque RZ268.6 Nm Tourneo Custom390 Nm
Engine Size RZNot Applicable Tourneo Custom1996 cc
Combined Fuel Economy RZNot Applicable Tourneo Custom13.5 km/l
Ground Clearance RZ200 mm Tourneo Custom130 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Lexus RZ

RZ 550e F SPORT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Ford Tourneo Custom

2.0L SWB Titanium X 8AT

Hagalu editorial rating
4.2/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

RZ

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Tourneo Custom

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

RZ

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Tourneo Custom

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec RZ Tourneo Custom
Model Introduced Year 2026 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Updated dedicated battery-electric Lexus RZ range launched locally in 2026 Current South African Tourneo Custom listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History 2026 South African range introduces RZ 500e, RZ 550e F SPORT and RZ 600e F SPORT Performance derivatives Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 South African range introduces RZ 500e, RZ 550e F SPORT and RZ 600e F SPORT Performance derivatives Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17 Current
Body Style SUV MPV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Luxury SUV Passenger van
Tare Mass Kg 2145-2165 kg Kerb not published; GVM 3200 kg
Vehicle Type SUV MPV
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Wheelbase Type - Short wheelbase
Spec RZ Tourneo Custom
Length 4805 mm 5050 mm
Width 1895 mm 2032 mm
Height 1635 mm 1979 mm
Wheelbase 2850 mm 3100 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 130 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 522 l 482 l
Kerb Weight 2180 kg 1559 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2640 kg 3200 kg
Payload Capacity 460 kg 454 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 2500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1013 mm 996 mm
Rear Headroom 1008 mm 957 mm
Front Legroom 1069 mm 1048 mm
Rear Legroom 953 mm 890 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This RZ and Tourneo Custom comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: RZ 83 vs Tourneo Custom 66.

Efficiency index: RZ 90 vs Tourneo Custom 57.

Safety-equipment index: RZ 94 vs Tourneo Custom 93.

Practicality index: RZ 62 vs Tourneo Custom 70.

Ownership-cover index: RZ not separately scored vs Tourneo Custom not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RZ leads by 10 points

RZ has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tourneo Custom remains close.

Evidence leader 82 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 60% source coverage
82
#1 Evidence leader

RZ

60% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Practicality 62
Performance 83
Efficiency 90
Safety 94
Practicality 62
Leads by 10 points
72
#2

Tourneo Custom

71% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 57
Performance 66
Efficiency 57
Safety 93
Practicality 70
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance RZ +17 Efficiency RZ +33 Safety RZ +1 Practicality Tourneo Custom +8

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RZ

Performance 83/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 62/100

Tourneo Custom

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 70/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus RZ leads the specification evidence index with 82 pts vs 72 pts for Tourneo Custom

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RZ leads. However, Tourneo Custom may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

RZ
RZ
VS
GLC Coupé
GLC Coupé
RZ vs GLC Coupé →
RZ
RZ
VS
iX2
iX2
RZ vs iX2 →
RZ
RZ
VS
Touareg
Touareg
RZ vs Touareg →
RZ
RZ
VS
Santa Fe Hybrid
Santa Fe Hybrid
RZ vs Santa Fe Hybrid →
RZ
RZ
VS
RX
RX
RZ vs RX →
RZ
RZ
VS
iX1
iX1
RZ vs iX1 →
Tourneo Custom
Tourneo Custom
VS
GLC Coupé
GLC Coupé
Tourneo Custom vs GLC Coupé →
Tourneo Custom
Tourneo Custom
VS
iX2
iX2
Tourneo Custom vs iX2 →

RZ vs Tourneo Custom questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.