Ford Puma vs Jetour X70 Plus

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Ford Puma
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic Archive reference
ZAR 459,900 last listed
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 16.4 km/l
VS
Jetour X70 Plus in South Africa

Jetour X70 Plus

Deluxe Petrol Automatic
ZAR 484,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 7.8 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance X70 Plus
Fuel Economy Puma
🛡 Safety Puma
📦 Practicality X70 Plus
🔑 Ownership Puma
Puma starts ZAR 454900 cheaper Puma from ZAR 389,900 · X70 Plus from ZAR 454,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Puma X70 Plus
Engine Power 92 115
Torque 170 230
Engine Size 999 1498
Claimed Mileage 16.4 7.8
Ground Clearance 170 200
Boot Space 456 1680
Airbags 8 Front and front side airbags plus side curtain airbags
Kerb Weight 1325 Not Applicable
Seating Capacity 5 7
Warranty 3 -

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Both Puma and X70 Plus are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance X70 Plus +9 pts
Efficiency Puma +28 pts
Safety Puma +33 pts
Practicality X70 Plus +30 pts
Ownership Puma +3 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

X70 Plus

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Puma

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

X70 Plus

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Puma X70 Plus
Model Introduced Year 2023 Not Available
Generation First generation Puma in South Africa Current local listing
Facelift History New model introduced in South Africa Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Discontinued - exact end year not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed SUV
Model Year Not confirmed Current
Production Status Not confirmed Active
Segment Not confirmed SUV
Vehicle Type Not confirmed SUV
Spec Puma X70 Plus
Ground Clearance 170 mm 200 mm
Wheelbase 2594 mm 2720 mm
Length 4186 mm 4724 mm
Width 1805 mm 1900 mm
Height 1531 mm 1720 mm
Kerb Weight 1325 kg Not Applicable
Gross Vehicle Weight 1775 kg 2076 kg
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 456 l 1680 l
Towing Capacity 1200 kg Not Applicable
Front Track Width 1541 mm Not Applicable
Rear Track Width 1534 mm Not Applicable
Turning Radius 5.4 m Not Applicable
Boot Volume 456 l 1680 l
Seats 5 7
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 l 57 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 1775 kg 2076 kg
Ground Clearance Max 170 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance Min 170 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 170 mm 200 mm
Height Mm 1531 mm 1720 mm
Length Mm 4186 mm 4724 mm
Cargo Volume 456 l 1680 l
Tare Mass Kg 1325 kg Not Applicable
Turning Circle 5.4 m Not Applicable
Turning Circle M 5.4 m Not Applicable
Width Mm 1805 mm 1900 mm
Load Bed Length Not confirmed Not Applicable
Load Bed Width Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Rear Legroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Headroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Rear Headroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Shoulder Room Not confirmed Not Applicable
Rear Shoulder Room Not confirmed Not Applicable
Boot Space Seats Folded Not confirmed 1680 l
Number of Doors Not confirmed Not Applicable
Max Payload Not confirmed Not Applicable
Doors Not confirmed Not Applicable
Loadbox Length Mm Not confirmed Not Applicable
Loadbox Width Mm Not confirmed Not Applicable
Payload Kg Not confirmed Not Applicable

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Puma leads by 4 points

Both Puma and X70 Plus are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 62 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 86% confidence
62
#1 Winner

Puma

86% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 64
Safety 99
Practicality 61
Ownership 43
Leads by 4 points
58
#2

X70 Plus

68% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 91 Check Efficiency 36
Performance 49
Efficiency 36
Safety 66
Practicality 91
Ownership 40
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance X70 Plus +9 Efficiency Puma +28 Safety Puma +33 Practicality X70 Plus +30 Ownership Puma +3

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 64/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 43/100

X70 Plus

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 36/100
Safety 66/100
Practicality 91/100
Ownership 40/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 62 pts vs 58 pts for X70 Plus

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, X70 Plus may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Puma edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Puma 64 vs X70 Plus 36. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Puma 99, X70 Plus 66. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Puma 43, X70 Plus 40. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Puma 61, X70 Plus 91. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Puma 40, X70 Plus 49. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Puma edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Puma scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Puma and X70 Plus in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Puma scores 40 vs 49.

Efficiency: Puma scores 64 vs 36.

Safety: Puma scores 99 vs 66.

Practicality: Puma scores 61 vs 91.

Ownership: Puma scores 43 vs 40.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.