Rolls-Royce Phantom vs Jetour T1

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Rolls-Royce Phantom in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Phantom

Phantom Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 900 Nm ⛽ 6.29 km/l
VS
Jetour T1 in South Africa

Jetour T1

Odyssey 2.0TD+7DCT 4WD Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 634,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 375 Nm ⛽ 11.1 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Rolls-Royce Phantom vs Jetour T1: the short answer

Phantom and T1 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Phantom T1
Maximum Power Phantom420 kW @ 5000 rpm T1180 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Phantom900 Nm @ 1700 rpm T1375 Nm
Engine Size Phantom6749 cc T11998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Phantom6.29 km/l T111.1 km/l
Ground Clearance Phantom136 mm T1190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Rolls-Royce Phantom

Phantom Series II

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Jetour T1

Odyssey 2.0TD+7DCT 4WD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Phantom

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance

T1

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Phantom

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

T1

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Phantom T1
Model Introduced Year 2018 2026
Generation Eighth-generation Phantom in standard-wheelbase Series II form Current local listing
Facelift History The eighth-generation Phantom was presented globally in 2017, introduced in South Africa in 2018 and received its light-touch Series II evolution in 2022 Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2022 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Four-door luxury saloon SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active Active
Segment Full-size super-luxury saloon SUV
Vehicle Type Internal-combustion passenger car SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 3808 kg
Tare Mass Kg - 1811 kg
Spec Phantom T1
Length 5762 mm 4705 mm
Width 2018 mm 1967 mm
Height 1646 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase 3552 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 136 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 136 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 l 70 l
Boot/Cargo Space 530 l 574 l
Kerb Weight 2560 kg 1811 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3235 kg 2208 kg
Payload Capacity 675 kg 375 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.55 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 1046 mm 1030 mm
Rear Headroom 978 mm 1010 mm
Front Legroom 1041 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 1105 mm 930 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Phantom and T1 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Phantom 96 vs T1 77.

Efficiency index: Phantom 29 vs T1 44.

Safety-equipment index: Phantom 95 vs T1 93.

Practicality index: Phantom 67 vs T1 67.

Ownership-cover index: Phantom not separately scored vs T1 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Phantom leads by 3 points

Phantom and T1 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 79% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Phantom

79% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 96 Check Efficiency 29
Performance 96
Efficiency 29
Safety 95
Practicality 67
Leads by 3 points
72
#2

T1

68% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 44
Performance 77
Efficiency 44
Safety 93
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Phantom +19 Efficiency T1 +15 Safety Phantom +2 Practicality Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Phantom

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 29/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 67/100

T1

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 44/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Phantom leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 72 pts for T1

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Phantom leads. However, T1 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Phantom vs T1 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.