Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs KIA Sorento

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

2.4L DI-DC 8-speed A/T 4X4 Exceed Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 904,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 133 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
KIA Sorento in South Africa

KIA Sorento

2.2 CRDi SXL AWD DCT Diesel 8-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 1,299,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 148 kW 🔧 440 Nm ⛽ 15.6 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport vs KIA Sorento: the short answer

Sorento has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Pajero Sport remains close.

Pajero Sport starts ZAR 210,005 cheaper Pajero Sport from ZAR 789,990 · Sorento from ZAR 999,995

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Pajero Sport Sorento
Maximum Power Pajero Sport133 kW @ 3500 rpm Sorento148 kW @ 3800 rpm
Maximum Torque Pajero Sport430 Nm @ 2500 rpm Sorento440 Nm @ 1750 rpm
Engine Size Pajero Sport2442 cc Sorento2151 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Pajero Sport12.3 km/l Sorento15.6 km/l
Ground Clearance Pajero Sport218 mm Sorento185 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Pajero Sport

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Sorento

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Pajero Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Sorento

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Pajero Sport Sorento
Model Introduced Year 2017 2021
Generation Third-generation Pajero Sport, 2025 facelift Fourth generation (MQ4); global launch 2020, SA 2021
Facelift History South African facelift launched in May 2025. Fourth generation (MQ4) launched SA 2021; updated spec 2024
Facelift Launched Since Current specification 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Seven-seat ladder-frame SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Color Note - Glacier White Pearl, Aurora Black Pearl, Steel Grey, Interstellar Grey, Gravity Blue
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.2 CRDi SXL AWD DCT
Tare Mass Kg - 1960 kg
Spec Pajero Sport Sorento
Length 4825 mm 4810 mm
Width 1815 mm 1900 mm
Height 1805 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase 2800 mm 2815 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 218 mm 185 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 190 mm 176 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 l 67 l
Boot/Cargo Space 193 l 219 l
Kerb Weight 2080 kg 1960 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2775 kg 2550 kg
Payload Capacity 695 kg 620 kg
Towing Capacity 2850 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 11.2 m
Front Headroom 1022 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 957 mm 955 mm
Front Legroom 1067 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 880 mm 855 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Pajero Sport and Sorento comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Pajero Sport 65 vs Sorento 74.

Efficiency index: Pajero Sport 49 vs Sorento 61.

Safety-equipment index: Pajero Sport 72 vs Sorento 100.

Practicality index: Pajero Sport 71 vs Sorento 64.

Ownership-cover index: Pajero Sport not separately scored vs Sorento 71.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Sorento leads by 10 points

Sorento has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Pajero Sport remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 99% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Sorento

99% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Efficiency 61
Performance 74
Efficiency 61
Safety 100
Practicality 64
Ownership 71
Leads by 10 points
65
#2

Pajero Sport

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 72 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 65
Efficiency 49
Safety 72
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Sorento +9 Efficiency Sorento +12 Safety Sorento +28 Practicality Pajero Sport +7

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Sorento

Performance 74/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 64/100
Ownership 71/100

Pajero Sport

Performance 65/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 72/100
Practicality 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index KIA Sorento leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 65 pts for Pajero Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Sorento leads. However, Pajero Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Pajero Sport vs Sorento questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.