GWM P500 vs Volkswagen T-Roc

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

GWM P500 in South Africa

GWM P500

2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT Hybrid 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 999,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 255 kW 🔧 648 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
VS
Volkswagen T-Roc in South Africa

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 140kW 4Motion R-Line DSG Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 760,100 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW 🔧 320 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM P500 vs Volkswagen T-Roc: the short answer

P500 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while T-Roc remains close.

T-Roc starts ZAR 151,000 cheaper P500 from ZAR 799,900 · T-Roc from ZAR 648,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification P500 T-Roc
Maximum Power P500255 kW T-Roc140 kW
Maximum Torque P500648 Nm T-Roc320 Nm
Engine Size P5002000 cc T-Roc2000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy P50010.2 km/l T-Roc15.9 km/l
Ground Clearance P500224 mm T-Roc168 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

GWM P500

2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Volkswagen T-Roc

2.0 TSI 140kW 4Motion R-Line DSG

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

P500

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

T-Roc

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

P500

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

T-Roc

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec P500 T-Roc
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2021
Generation Current South African P500 listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Current first-generation T-Roc remains on sale while the second generation is prepared for South Africa
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Volkswagen has confirmed the all-new second-generation T-Roc for the second half of 2026; local derivatives and prices are still pending
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Volkswagen has confirmed the all-new second-generation T-Roc for the second half of 2026; local derivatives and prices are still pending
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Double-cab pickup SUV
Body Type Cab Pickup -
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red, Orange
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT 4x4 configuration for the local line-up
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status published published
Segment Pickup SUV
Tare Mass Kg 2761 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Type Pickup SUV
Spec P500 T-Roc
Length 5445 mm 4234 mm
Width 1991 mm 1819 mm
Height 1924 mm 1573 mm
Wheelbase 3350 mm 2593 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 224 mm 168 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 l 392 l
Kerb Weight 2810 kg 1400 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3495 kg 2020 kg
Payload Capacity 685 kg -
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm -
Rear Headroom 960 mm -
Front Legroom 1050 mm -
Rear Legroom 900 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This P500 and T-Roc comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: P500 98 vs T-Roc 64.

Efficiency index: P500 50 vs T-Roc 61.

Safety-equipment index: P500 88 vs T-Roc 99.

Practicality index: P500 78 vs T-Roc 58.

Ownership-cover index: P500 65 vs T-Roc 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

P500 leads by 11 points

P500 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while T-Roc remains close.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 73% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

P500

73% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Efficiency 50
Performance 98
Efficiency 50
Safety 88
Practicality 78
Ownership 65
Leads by 11 points
67
#2

T-Roc

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Ownership 43
Performance 64
Efficiency 61
Safety 99
Practicality 58
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance P500 +34 Efficiency T-Roc +11 Safety T-Roc +11 Practicality P500 +20 Ownership P500 +22

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

P500

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 78/100
Ownership 65/100

T-Roc

Performance 64/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM P500 leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 67 pts for T-Roc

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, P500 leads. However, T-Roc may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

P500
P500
VS
Tunland V9 Double Cab
Tunland V9 Double Cab
P500 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab →
P500
P500
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
P500 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
P500
P500
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
P500 vs Land Cruiser FJ →
P500
P500
VS
Ranger Sport
Ranger Sport
P500 vs Ranger Sport →
P500
P500
VS
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
P500 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab →
P500
P500
VS
RD6
RD6
P500 vs RD6 →
T-Roc
T-Roc
VS
Tunland V9 Double Cab
Tunland V9 Double Cab
T-Roc vs Tunland V9 Double Cab →
T-Roc
T-Roc
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
T-Roc vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →

P500 vs T-Roc questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.