Mitsubishi Outlander vs Chery Tiggo 9

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Outlander in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander

2.5L Exceed CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 819,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 9 in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 9

Vanguard AWD 2.0T Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 779,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 187 kW 🔧 390 Nm ⛽ 12.0 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Chery Tiggo 9: the short answer

Tiggo 9 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Outlander remains close.

Tiggo 9 starts ZAR 70,095 cheaper Outlander from ZAR 759,995 · Tiggo 9 from ZAR 689,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Outlander Tiggo 9
Maximum Power Outlander135 kW @ 6000 rpm Tiggo 9187 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Outlander245 Nm @ 3600 rpm Tiggo 9390 Nm
Engine Size Outlander2488 cc Tiggo 92000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Outlander12.3 km/l Tiggo 912.0 km/l
Ground Clearance Outlander210 mm Tiggo 9147 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Outlander

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Tiggo 9

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Outlander

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Tiggo 9

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Outlander Tiggo 9
Model Introduced Year 2022 2026
Generation Fourth-generation Outlander Current South Africa Tiggo 9 range
Facelift History Current 2026 South African specification including Edition 25. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since Current specification 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Medium seven-seat SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1980 kg
Spec Outlander Tiggo 9
Length 4710 mm 4810 mm
Width 1862 mm 1925 mm
Height 1745 mm 1741 mm
Wheelbase 2706 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 147 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 180 mm 147 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 65 l
Boot/Cargo Space 205 l 448 l
Kerb Weight 1690 kg 1980 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2355 kg 2587 kg
Payload Capacity 665 kg 607 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 1425 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.9 m
Front Headroom 986 mm 1025 mm
Rear Headroom 950 mm 990 mm
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1060 mm
Rear Legroom 1014 mm 960 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Outlander and Tiggo 9 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Outlander 56 vs Tiggo 9 80.

Efficiency index: Outlander 49 vs Tiggo 9 47.

Safety-equipment index: Outlander 76 vs Tiggo 9 94.

Practicality index: Outlander 64 vs Tiggo 9 67.

Ownership-cover index: Outlander not separately scored vs Tiggo 9 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiggo 9 leads by 12 points

Tiggo 9 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Outlander remains close.

Evidence leader 74 /100
Lead 12 points
Data 69% source coverage
74
#1 Evidence leader

Tiggo 9

69% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 80
Efficiency 47
Safety 94
Practicality 67
Leads by 12 points
62
#2

Outlander

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 56
Efficiency 49
Safety 76
Practicality 64
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 9 +24 Efficiency Outlander +2 Safety Tiggo 9 +18 Practicality Tiggo 9 +3

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiggo 9

Performance 80/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 67/100

Outlander

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 64/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Chery Tiggo 9 leads the specification evidence index with 74 pts vs 62 pts for Outlander

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiggo 9 leads. However, Outlander may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Outlander vs Tiggo 9 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.