Mitsubishi Outlander vs Mahindra Scorpio-N

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Outlander in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander

2.5L Exceed CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 819,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
Mahindra Scorpio-N in South Africa

Mahindra Scorpio-N

Z8L 4x4 AT Adventure Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 129 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Outlander vs Mahindra Scorpio-N: the short answer

Scorpio-N has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Outlander remains close.

Scorpio-N starts ZAR 269,996 cheaper Outlander from ZAR 759,995 · Scorpio-N from ZAR 489,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Outlander Scorpio-N
Maximum Power Outlander135 kW @ 6000 rpm Scorpio-N128.6 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque Outlander245 Nm @ 3600 rpm Scorpio-N400 Nm
Engine Size Outlander2488 cc Scorpio-N2184 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Outlander12.3 km/l Scorpio-N14.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Outlander210 mm Scorpio-N187 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Outlander

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Scorpio-N

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Outlander

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Scorpio-N

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Outlander Scorpio-N
Model Introduced Year 2022 Not Available
Generation Fourth-generation Outlander Current local listing
Facelift History Current 2026 South African specification including Edition 25. Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since Current specification Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active Active
Segment Medium seven-seat SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1825-2070 kg
Spec Outlander Scorpio-N
Length 4710 mm 4662 mm
Width 1862 mm 1918 mm
Height 1745 mm 1905 mm
Wheelbase 2706 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 187 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 180 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 57 l
Boot/Cargo Space 205 l 460 l
Kerb Weight 1690 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2355 kg -
Payload Capacity 665 kg -
Towing Capacity 1600 kg -
Seating Capacity 7 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows -
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m -
Front Headroom 986 mm -
Rear Headroom 950 mm -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 1014 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Outlander and Scorpio-N comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Outlander 56 vs Scorpio-N 69.

Efficiency index: Outlander 49 vs Scorpio-N 60.

Safety-equipment index: Outlander 76 vs Scorpio-N 90.

Practicality index: Outlander 64 vs Scorpio-N 78.

Ownership-cover index: Outlander not separately scored vs Scorpio-N not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Scorpio-N leads by 13 points

Scorpio-N has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Outlander remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 54% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Scorpio-N

54% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 60
Performance 69
Efficiency 60
Safety 90
Practicality 78
Leads by 13 points
62
#2

Outlander

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 56
Efficiency 49
Safety 76
Practicality 64
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Scorpio-N +13 Efficiency Scorpio-N +11 Safety Scorpio-N +14 Practicality Scorpio-N +14

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Scorpio-N

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 78/100

Outlander

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 64/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mahindra Scorpio-N leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 62 pts for Outlander

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Scorpio-N leads. However, Outlander may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Outlander vs Scorpio-N questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.