Toyota Land Cruiser 79 vs KIA Tasman

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol Manual
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
KIA Tasman in South Africa

KIA Tasman

2.2D X-Pro 4x4 Double Cab Colour Coded Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,004,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 147 kW 🔧 440 Nm Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Land Cruiser 79
Fuel Economy Tie
🛡 Safety Tasman
📦 Practicality Tasman
🔑 Ownership Tasman
Tasman starts ZAR 706200 cheaper Land Cruiser 79 from ZAR 706,200 · Tasman from ZAR 679,995

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Land Cruiser 79 Tasman
Engine Power 202 147 kW
Torque 381 440 Nm
Engine Size 3956 2151
Claimed Mileage 13.0 11.8
Ground Clearance 235 231
Boot Space Not Available 1115
Airbags 2 6
Kerb Weight 2050 2085
Seating Capacity Available 5
Warranty 3 7

= leads in this spec

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

Tasman

73
/ 100
+28
pts
#2

Land Cruiser 79

45
/ 100

High confidence result.

The Bottom Line

Tasman dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Land Cruiser 79 +3 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety Tasman +12 pts
Practicality Tasman +11 pts
Ownership Tasman +8 pts

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

Tasman

Performance 15/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 20/20
Ownership 20/20

Land Cruiser 79

Performance 18/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser 79

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

Tasman

Strengths
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 79

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Tasman

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 79 Tasman
Ground Clearance 235 231
Wheelbase 3085 3200
Length 5270 5335
Width 1855 1930
Height 1855 1895
Kerb Weight 2050 2085
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 3250
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space Not Available 1115
Towing Capacity 3500 3500
Turning Radius 6.4 12.6
Number of Doors 5 4
Boot Space Seats Folded 1500 1115
Front Track Width 1550 1619
Rear Track Width 1540 1625
Load Bed Length Available 1520
Load Bed Width Available 1165
Front Legroom Available 1040
Rear Legroom Available 855
Front Headroom Available 1010
Rear Headroom Available 955
Front Shoulder Room Available 1405
Rear Shoulder Room Available 1350
Max Payload Available 1100
Boot Volume Available 1115
Doors Available 4
Seats Available 5
Front Overhang Available 940
Fuel Tank Capacity Available 80
Rear Overhang Available 1195
Spec Land Cruiser 79 Tasman
Engine 1GR-FE 2.2 CRDi D4HB Inline-4 Diesel
Engine Type V6 Inline 4 Cylinder Turbodiesel
Displacement 3956 2151
Cylinders 6 4
Valves per Cylinder 24 16
Power 202 147 kW
Torque 381 440 Nm
Fuel System Multi-Point EFI Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 175 185
0-100 km/h 9.5 9.8
Power @ RPM 5600 rpm 3,800 rpm
Torque @ RPM 4400 rpm 1,750 rpm
Turbocharger No Yes
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Engine Code Standard D4HB
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 15.4:1
Cylinder Bore 82.0 85.4
Piston Stroke 92.0 94.0
Fuel Grade Required Petrol B7 Diesel
Engine Position Available Front Transverse
Engine Oil Capacity Available 7.0
Power 150 197
Variable Valve Timing Available No
Maximum Engine RPM Available 4,000 rpm
Engine Type Config Available Inline 4 Cylinder (I4) DOHC 16-Valve Diesel
0–100 km/h Available 9.8
Battery Capacity Available N/A
Charging Port Available N/A
AC Charging Time Available N/A
Engine Displacement Available 2151
EV Range Available N/A

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 KIA Tasman wins with 73 pts vs 45 pts for Land Cruiser 79

In structured scoring, Tasman emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 79 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tasman edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Land Cruiser 79 0 vs Tasman 0. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Land Cruiser 79 6, Tasman 18. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Land Cruiser 79 12, Tasman 20. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Land Cruiser 79 9, Tasman 20. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Land Cruiser 79 18, Tasman 15. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tasman edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tasman scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Land Cruiser 79 and Tasman in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Land Cruiser 79 scores 18 vs 15.

Efficiency: Land Cruiser 79 scores 0 vs 0.

Safety: Land Cruiser 79 scores 6 vs 18.

Practicality: Land Cruiser 79 scores 9 vs 20.

Ownership: Land Cruiser 79 scores 12 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives Tasman the advantage in this comparison.