Toyota Land Cruiser 76 vs GWM Tank 500

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

4.0 V6 Station Wagon AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,065,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
VS
GWM Tank 500 in South Africa

GWM Tank 500

3.0T Hi4-T Luxury Plug-in Hybrid 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 340 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 40 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser 76 vs GWM Tank 500: the short answer

Tank 500 has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Land Cruiser 76.

Land Cruiser 76 starts ZAR 169,900 cheaper Land Cruiser 76 from ZAR 980,000 · Tank 500 from ZAR 1,149,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser 76 Tank 500
Maximum Power Land Cruiser 76202 kW Tank 500340 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser 76381 Nm Tank 500750 Nm
Engine Size Land Cruiser 763956 cc Tank 5002999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 7613 km/l Tank 50040 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser 76230 mm Tank 500224 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser 76

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Tank 500

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 76

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tank 500

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 76 Tank 500
360 Degree Camera Not Available Yes
Adaptive Cruise Control Not Available Yes
Adaptive Cruise Control Not Available Yes
Around View Monitor Not Available Yes
Autonomous Emergency Braking Not Available Yes
Auto Lights Not Available Yes
Auto Wipers Not Available Yes
Blind Spot Monitoring Not Available Yes
Blind Spot Warning Not Available Yes
Cruise Control Standard Yes
Emergency Braking Not Available Yes
EV Mode Not Available Yes
Lane Keep Assist Not Available Yes
Parking Distance Sensors Not Available Front and Rear
Parking Sensor Not Available Front and Rear
Parking Sensors Not Available Front and Rear
Pre-Collision System Not Available Yes
Rain Sensor Wipers Not Available Yes
Rear View Camera Not Available Yes
Rear View Camera Not Available Yes
Reverse Camera Not Available Yes
Reverse Camera Type Not Available Yes
Reversing Camera Not Available Yes
Surround View Camera Not Available Yes
Lane Departure Warning Not Available Yes
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Not Available Yes
Rear Parking Sensors Not Available Yes
Traffic Sign Recognition Not Available Yes
Driver Fatigue Alert Not Available Yes
Auto Highbeam Not Available Yes
Park Assist Not Available Yes
Forward Collision Warning Not Available Yes
Attention Assist - Yes
Automatic High Beam - Yes
Auto Park Assist - No
Eco Mode - Yes
Front Camera - Yes
Sport Mode - Yes
Spec Land Cruiser 76 Tank 500
4WD Engagement Available Not Applicable
4WD Hi Range Available Not Applicable
4WD Lo Range Available where 4WD low range is fitted Not Applicable
4WD Selector Confirmed 4WD derivative Not Applicable
Automatic Shift Paddles No Yes
Axle Layout 4WD AWD
Drive Mode Selector 4WD/off-road drive mode support 4WD/off-road drive mode support
Drivetrain 4WD All Wheel Drive (Hi4-T Hybrid)
Drivetrain Layout 4WD Part-Time Front Engine All Wheel Drive
Number of Gears 4 9
Gear Shift Type 4-Speed Automatic Automatic
Gearbox 4-Speed Automatic 9-Speed Automatic
Gearbox Type 4-Speed Automatic 9-Speed Automatic
LSD Available Standard Yes
Low Range Available where 4WD low range is fitted Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters No Yes
Transfer Case Standard Not Applicable
Transmission Speeds 4 9
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Differential Lock Not Applicable Yes
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Yes
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Yes
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable 3.73
Clutch Type Not Applicable Torque Converter
Gear Shift Indicator Not Applicable Yes
Engine Position - Front Transverse
Reverse Gear Warning - Yes
Steering Turns Lock to Lock - 14.7:1

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser 76 and Tank 500 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser 76 77 vs Tank 500 100.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 76 49 vs Tank 500 97.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 76 50 vs Tank 500 100.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser 76 96 vs Tank 500 83.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 76 43 vs Tank 500 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tank 500 leads by 25 points

Tank 500 has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Land Cruiser 76.

Evidence leader 90 /100
Lead 25 points
Data 96% source coverage
90
#1 Evidence leader

Tank 500

96% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 100
Efficiency 97
Safety 100
Practicality 83
Ownership 65
Leads by 25 points
65
#2

Land Cruiser 76

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 96 Check Ownership 43
Performance 77
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 96
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 500 +23 Efficiency Tank 500 +48 Safety Tank 500 +50 Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +13 Ownership Tank 500 +22

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tank 500

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 97/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 83/100
Ownership 65/100

Land Cruiser 76

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 96/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM Tank 500 leads the specification evidence index with 90 pts vs 65 pts for Land Cruiser 76

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tank 500 leads. However, Land Cruiser 76 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Land Cruiser 76 vs Tank 500 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.