Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Hyundai Venue Cargo

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW 🔧 700 Nm ⛽ 9.4 km/l
VS
Hyundai Venue Cargo in South Africa

Hyundai Venue Cargo

1.2 Premium Cargo MT Petrol Current
ZAR 309,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 61 kW 🔧 114 Nm ⛽ 15.4 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Hyundai Venue Cargo: the short answer

Land Cruiser 300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Venue Cargo.

Venue Cargo starts ZAR 1,540,000 cheaper Land Cruiser 300 from ZAR 1,849,900 · Venue Cargo from ZAR 309,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser 300 Venue Cargo
Maximum Power Land Cruiser 300227 kW Venue Cargo61 kW
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser 300700 Nm Venue Cargo114 Nm
Engine Size Land Cruiser 3003346 cc Venue Cargo1197 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 3009.4 km/l Venue Cargo15.4 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser 300235 mm Venue Cargo190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Land Cruiser 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Venue Cargo

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 300

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Venue Cargo

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 300 Venue Cargo
Model Introduced Year 2021 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation 300-series Land Cruiser on latest LGAA platform Current South African Venue Cargo listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History New generation introduced in 2021 with complete redesign Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2021 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Panel van
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Dark Blue, Bronze Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Base grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Van
Tare Mass Kg 2430 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Van
Spec Land Cruiser 300 Venue Cargo
Length 4985 mm 3995 mm
Width 1980 mm 1770 mm
Height 1910 mm 1617 mm
Wheelbase 2850 mm 2500 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 235 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 110 l 45 l
Boot/Cargo Space 309 l 1296 l
Kerb Weight 2430 kg 1250 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3300 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity 870 kg 620 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 7 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 1 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 1010 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 957 mm Not Applicable
Front Legroom 1105 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 900 mm Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser 300 and Venue Cargo comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser 300 95 vs Venue Cargo 30.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 300 40 vs Venue Cargo 61.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 300 99 vs Venue Cargo 89.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser 300 82 vs Venue Cargo 66.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 300 43 vs Venue Cargo 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Land Cruiser 300 leads by 15 points

Land Cruiser 300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Venue Cargo.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 92% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Land Cruiser 300

92% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 40
Performance 95
Efficiency 40
Safety 99
Practicality 82
Ownership 43
Leads by 15 points
61
#2

Venue Cargo

70% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 89 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 61
Safety 89
Practicality 66
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 300 +65 Efficiency Venue Cargo +21 Safety Land Cruiser 300 +10 Practicality Land Cruiser 300 +16 Ownership Venue Cargo +22

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 95/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 82/100
Ownership 43/100

Venue Cargo

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 89/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Land Cruiser 300 leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 61 pts for Venue Cargo

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, Venue Cargo may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
NX
NX
Land Cruiser 300 vs NX →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
X3
X3
Land Cruiser 300 vs X3 →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
Land Cruiser 300 vs ATTO 8 →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
SEALION 7
SEALION 7
Land Cruiser 300 vs SEALION 7 →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
GLC
GLC
Land Cruiser 300 vs GLC →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
Transit Van
Transit Van
Land Cruiser 300 vs Transit Van →
Venue Cargo
Venue Cargo
VS
NX
NX
Venue Cargo vs NX →
Venue Cargo
Venue Cargo
VS
X3
X3
Venue Cargo vs X3 →

Land Cruiser 300 vs Venue Cargo questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.