Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW 🔧 700 Nm ⛽ 9.4 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 870,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab: the short answer

Land Cruiser 300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab remains close.

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab starts ZAR 1,048,900 cheaper Land Cruiser 300 from ZAR 1,849,900 · Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab from ZAR 801,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser 300 Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Maximum Power Land Cruiser 300227 kW Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab202 kW
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser 300700 Nm Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab381 Nm
Engine Size Land Cruiser 3003346 cc Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab3956 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 3009.4 km/l Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab13 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser 300235 mm Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

4.0 V6 Double Cab MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Land Cruiser 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 300

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 300 Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Model Introduced Year 2021 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation 300-series Land Cruiser on latest LGAA platform Current South African Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History New generation introduced in 2021 with complete redesign Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2021 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Pickup
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Dark Blue, Bronze Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Pickup
Tare Mass Kg 2430 kg 2050 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Pickup
Body Type Cab - Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Spec Land Cruiser 300 Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Length 4985 mm 5270 mm
Width 1980 mm 1855 mm
Height 1910 mm 1855 mm
Wheelbase 2850 mm 3085 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 235 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 110 l 87 l
Boot/Cargo Space 309 l 470 l
Kerb Weight 2430 kg 2050 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3300 kg 3100 kg
Payload Capacity 870 kg 1050 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6 m 6.4 m
Front Headroom 1010 mm 983 mm
Rear Headroom 957 mm 951 mm
Front Legroom 1105 mm 1033 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 886 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser 300 and Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser 300 95 vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 78.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 300 40 vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 49.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 300 99 vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 50.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser 300 82 vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 85.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 300 43 vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Land Cruiser 300 leads by 13 points

Land Cruiser 300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 92% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

Land Cruiser 300

92% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 40
Performance 95
Efficiency 40
Safety 99
Practicality 82
Ownership 43
Leads by 13 points
63
#2

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

86% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 85 Check Ownership 43
Performance 78
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 85
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 300 +17 Efficiency Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +9 Safety Land Cruiser 300 +49 Practicality Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab +3 Ownership Level

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 95/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 82/100
Ownership 43/100

Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

Performance 78/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 85/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Land Cruiser 300 leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 63 pts for Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
iX2
iX2
Land Cruiser 300 vs iX2 →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
Ranger Raptor
Ranger Raptor
Land Cruiser 300 vs Ranger Raptor →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
Santa Fe Hybrid
Santa Fe Hybrid
Land Cruiser 300 vs Santa Fe Hybrid →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
GLC Coupé
GLC Coupé
Land Cruiser 300 vs GLC Coupé →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
Land Cruiser 300 vs D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 →
Land Cruiser 300
Land Cruiser 300
VS
iX1
iX1
Land Cruiser 300 vs iX1 →
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
VS
iX2
iX2
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab vs iX2 →
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab
VS
Ranger Raptor
Ranger Raptor
Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab vs Ranger Raptor →

Land Cruiser 300 vs Land Cruiser 79 Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.