Hyundai Kona vs MG ZS Pro

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Kona Discontinued model
Hyundai Kona in South Africa

Hyundai Kona

1.0T DCT Executive Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 565,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 88 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 15.5 km/l
VS
MG ZS Pro in South Africa

MG ZS Pro

1.5T CVT Luxury Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 431,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 275 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Kona vs MG ZS Pro: the short answer

Kona and ZS Pro are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context Kona: last listed from ZAR 459,900 · ZS Pro: current from ZAR 397,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Kona ZS Pro
Maximum Power Kona88 kW @ 5500 rpm ZS Pro125 kW
Maximum Torque Kona172 Nm @ 1500 rpm ZS Pro275 Nm
Engine Size Kona998 cc ZS Pro1496 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Kona15.5 km/l ZS Pro14.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Kona165 mm ZS Pro161 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai Kona 1.0T DCT Executive

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Kona

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

ZS Pro

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Kona

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

ZS Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Kona ZS Pro
Model Introduced Year 2018 2025
Generation Second generation Kona on Hyundai's K2 GEN platform; the design is more conservative than the first gen but better resolved Current South African ZS Pro compact SUV with a 1.5-litre turbo engine, CVT and two-grade matrix.
Facelift History Second generation launched globally in 2023 and brought to SA; softened styling compared to the sharper first gen, improved interior quality and tech Launched locally in 2025 while the value-led ZS remained current.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2025
Tare Mass Kg 1460 kg -
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Five-door compact SUV
Model Year Not confirmed 2025
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed Compact SUV
Vehicle Type Not confirmed SUV
Spec Kona ZS Pro
Length 4355 mm 4430 mm
Width 1825 mm 1818 mm
Height 1570 mm 1635 mm
Wheelbase 2660 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 165 mm 161 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l 443 l
Kerb Weight 1460 kg 1390 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not confirmed Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not confirmed 1840 kg
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 450 kg
Towing Capacity Not confirmed 500 kg
Number of Rows Not confirmed 2 rows
Minimum Turning Radius Not confirmed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom Not confirmed 875 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed 865 mm
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1060 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Kona and ZS Pro comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Kona 40 vs ZS Pro 56.

Efficiency index: Kona 62 vs ZS Pro 58.

Safety-equipment index: Kona 87 vs ZS Pro 91.

Practicality index: Kona 67 vs ZS Pro 55.

Ownership-cover index: Kona 65 vs ZS Pro not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

ZS Pro leads by 1 points

Kona and ZS Pro are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 65 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 80% source coverage
65
#1 Evidence leader

ZS Pro

80% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Practicality 55
Performance 56
Efficiency 58
Safety 91
Practicality 55
Leads by 1 points
64
#2

Kona

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 62
Safety 87
Practicality 67
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance ZS Pro +16 Efficiency Kona +4 Safety ZS Pro +4 Practicality Kona +12

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

ZS Pro

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 58/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 55/100

Kona

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG ZS Pro leads the specification evidence index with 65 pts vs 64 pts for Kona

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, ZS Pro leads. However, Kona may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Kona vs ZS Pro questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.