GWM Jolion vs Lexus RZ

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

GWM Jolion in South Africa

GWM Jolion

1.5T Hybrid LT Hybrid Current
ZAR 519,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 17.9 km/l
VS
Lexus RZ in South Africa

Lexus RZ

RZ 550e F SPORT Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,977,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 300 kW 🔧 269 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM Jolion vs Lexus RZ: the short answer

RZ has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Jolion remains close.

Jolion starts ZAR 1,272,700 cheaper Jolion from ZAR 409,900 · RZ from ZAR 1,682,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Jolion RZ
Maximum Power Jolion115 kW @ 5500 rpm RZ300 kW
Maximum Torque Jolion250 Nm RZ268.6 Nm
Engine Size Jolion1497 cc RZNot Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy Jolion17.9 km/l RZNot Applicable
Ground Clearance Jolion190 mm RZ200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

GWM Jolion

1.5T Hybrid LT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Lexus RZ

RZ 550e F SPORT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Jolion

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

RZ

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Jolion

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

RZ

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Jolion RZ
360 Degree Camera Yes EMV// Panoramic View Monitor
Active Engine Braking No -
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Standard Adaptive,All Speed
Adaptive Cruise Control Yes Standard Adaptive,All Speed
Around View Monitor Yes EMV// Panoramic View Monitor
Attention Assist Yes -
Autonomous Emergency Braking Yes Standard
Automatic High Beam Yes -
Auto Highbeam Yes Standard
Auto Lights Yes -
Auto Park Assist No -
Auto Wipers Yes Auto,Rainsensing
Blind Spot Monitoring Yes Standard With Rear Cross Traffic Alert,Safe Exit Assist
Blind Spot Warning Yes Standard With Rear Cross Traffic Alert,Safe Exit Assist
Cruise Control Yes Standard Adaptive,All Speed
Driver Fatigue Alert Yes Standard
Eco Mode Yes -
Emergency Braking Yes -
EV Mode Yes -
Forward Collision Warning Yes Standard
Front Camera Yes -
Lane Departure Warning Yes Standard Lane Trace Assist
Lane Keep Assist Yes Standard Lane Trace Assist
Park Assist Yes Standard
Parking Distance Sensors Front and Rear -
Parking Sensor Front and Rear -
Parking Sensors Front and Rear Standard Front + Rear,Intelligent Clearance Sonar,Rear Cross Traffic Alert + Braking
Pre-Collision System Yes -
Rain Sensor Wipers Yes -
Rear View Camera Yes EMV// Panoramic View Monitor
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Yes Standard
Rear Parking Sensors Yes Standard Front + Rear,Intelligent Clearance Sonar,Rear Cross Traffic Alert + Braking
Rear View Camera Yes -
Reverse Camera Yes EMV// Panoramic View Monitor
Reverse Camera Type Yes -
Reversing Camera Yes -
Sport Mode Yes -
Surround View Camera Yes EMV// Panoramic View Monitor
Traffic Sign Recognition Yes Standard
Spec Jolion RZ
4WD Engagement Not Applicable Permanent all-wheel drive
4WD Hi Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Selector Not Applicable Not Applicable
Automatic Shift Paddles No Standard
Axle Layout FWD AWD DIRECT4
Clutch Type Wet Multi-Disc Not Applicable
Differential Lock No Not Applicable
Differential Type Front Not Available -
Differential Type Rear Not Available -
Drive Mode Selector Yes -
Drivetrain Front Wheel Drive AWD DIRECT4
Drivetrain Layout Front Engine Front Wheel Drive AWD DIRECT4
Engine Position Front Transverse -
Final Drive Ratio 3.73 13.786:1 front / 13.786:1 rear
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Number of Gears 2 1
Gear Shift Indicator Yes Standard
Gear Shift Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox DHT Hybrid Transmission Single-speed electric drive
Gearbox Type DHT Hybrid Transmission Single-speed electric drive
LSD Available No Not Applicable
Low Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters No Standard
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Reverse Gear Warning Yes -
Steering Turns Lock to Lock 14.7:1 -
Transfer Case Not Applicable Not Applicable
Transfer Case Guard Not Available -
Transmission Speeds 2 1
Transmission Type Automatic Single-speed electric drive

In depth: how these cars differ

This Jolion and RZ comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Jolion 51 vs RZ 83.

Efficiency index: Jolion 73 vs RZ 90.

Safety-equipment index: Jolion 93 vs RZ 94.

Practicality index: Jolion 59 vs RZ 62.

Ownership-cover index: Jolion 65 vs RZ not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RZ leads by 14 points

RZ has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Jolion remains close.

Evidence leader 82 /100
Lead 14 points
Data 60% source coverage
82
#1 Evidence leader

RZ

60% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Practicality 62
Performance 83
Efficiency 90
Safety 94
Practicality 62
Leads by 14 points
68
#2

Jolion

99% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 73
Safety 93
Practicality 59
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance RZ +32 Efficiency RZ +17 Safety RZ +1 Practicality RZ +3

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RZ

Performance 83/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 62/100

Jolion

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 73/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 59/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus RZ leads the specification evidence index with 82 pts vs 68 pts for Jolion

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RZ leads. However, Jolion may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Jolion vs RZ questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.