GWM Jolion Pro vs Mitsubishi Outlander

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

GWM Jolion Pro in South Africa

GWM Jolion Pro

1.5T Pro Ultra Luxury 7DCT Petrol Current
ZAR 466,450 ex-showroom
⚡ 105 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander

2.5L Exceed CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 819,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Outlander
Fuel Economy Jolion Pro
🛡 Safety Jolion Pro
📦 Practicality Jolion Pro
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Jolion Pro starts ZAR 367,845 cheaper Jolion Pro from ZAR 392,150 · Outlander from ZAR 759,995

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Jolion Pro Outlander
Maximum Power 105 kW 135 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 210 Nm 245 Nm @ 3600 rpm
Engine Size 1500 cc 2488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 12.3 km/l 12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance 168 mm 210 mm
Boot / Load Bay - 205 l
Airbags Dual SRS airbags with front side airbags; side curtain airbags grade dependent 7
Kerb Weight - 1690 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Warranty 7 years / 200 000 km 3 years / 100,000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Jolion Pro and Outlander are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Outlander +14 pts
Efficiency Jolion Pro +2 pts
Safety Jolion Pro +12 pts
Practicality Jolion Pro +1 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Catalogue-index leader

Jolion Pro

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Outlander

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Jolion Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Outlander

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Jolion Pro Outlander
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2022
Generation Current South African Jolion Pro listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Fourth-generation Outlander
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Current 2026 South African specification including Edition 25.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment SUV Medium seven-seat SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1376-1540 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Passenger vehicle
Spec Jolion Pro Outlander
Length 4472 mm 4710 mm
Width 1841 mm 1862 mm
Height 1619 mm 1745 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2706 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 168 mm 210 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 l 55 l
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Boot/Cargo Space - 205 l
Kerb Weight - 1690 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) - 2355 kg
Payload Capacity - 665 kg
Towing Capacity - 1600 kg
Number of Rows - 3 rows
Minimum Turning Radius - 5.5 m
Front Headroom - 986 mm
Rear Headroom - 950 mm
Front Legroom - 1058 mm
Rear Legroom - 1014 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Jolion Pro leads by 0 points

Jolion Pro and Outlander are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 63 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 60% source coverage
63
#1 Index leader

Jolion Pro

60% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 45
Performance 45
Efficiency 51
Safety 88
Practicality 65
Ownership 65
Leads by 0 points
63
#2

Outlander

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 59
Efficiency 49
Safety 76
Practicality 64
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Outlander +14 Efficiency Jolion Pro +2 Safety Jolion Pro +12 Practicality Jolion Pro +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Jolion Pro

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 65/100

Outlander

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 64/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 GWM Jolion Pro leads the catalogue index with 63 pts vs 63 pts for Outlander

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Jolion Pro leads. However, Outlander may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Jolion Pro and Outlander comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Jolion Pro 45 vs Outlander 59.

Efficiency index: Jolion Pro 51 vs Outlander 49.

Safety-equipment index: Jolion Pro 88 vs Outlander 76.

Practicality index: Jolion Pro 65 vs Outlander 64.

Ownership-cover index: Jolion Pro 65 vs Outlander not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.