Honda HR-V vs Hyundai Kona

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Kona Discontinued model
Honda HR-V in South Africa

Honda HR-V

1.5 Elegance CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 119 kW 🔧 145 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
VS
Hyundai Kona in South Africa

Hyundai Kona

1.0T DCT Executive Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 565,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 88 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 15.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda HR-V vs Hyundai Kona: the short answer

HR-V and Kona are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context HR-V: current from ZAR 489,900 · Kona: last listed from ZAR 459,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification HR-V Kona
Maximum Power HR-V119 kW Kona88 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque HR-V145 Nm Kona172 Nm @ 1500 rpm
Engine Size HR-V1498 cc Kona998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy HR-V16.1 km/l Kona15.5 km/l
Ground Clearance HR-V196 mm Kona165 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai Kona 1.0T DCT Executive

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

HR-V

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

Kona

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

HR-V

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Kona

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec HR-V Kona
Model Introduced Year 2022 2018
Generation Built on Honda’s global compact SUV platform with improved safety and comfort Second generation Kona on Hyundai's K2 GEN platform; the design is more conservative than the first gen but better resolved
Facelift History New generation introduced with updated design and improved features Second generation launched globally in 2023 and brought to SA; softened styling compared to the sharper first gen, improved interior quality and tech
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red Not confirmed
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg 1360 kg 1460 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec HR-V Kona
Length 4340 mm 4355 mm
Width 1790 mm 1825 mm
Height 1590 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase 2610 mm 2660 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 196 mm 165 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 196 mm Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 437 l 466 l
Kerb Weight 1360 kg 1460 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1780 kg Not confirmed
Payload Capacity 410 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 1200 kg Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m Not confirmed
Front Headroom 975 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 965 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 1065 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 958 mm Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This HR-V and Kona comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: HR-V 41 vs Kona 40.

Efficiency index: HR-V 62 vs Kona 62.

Safety-equipment index: HR-V 91 vs Kona 87.

Practicality index: HR-V 60 vs Kona 67.

Ownership-cover index: HR-V 43 vs Kona 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Kona leads by 4 points

HR-V and Kona are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 64 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 89% source coverage
64
#1 Evidence leader

Kona

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 62
Safety 87
Practicality 67
Ownership 65
Leads by 4 points
60
#2

HR-V

90% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 41
Performance 41
Efficiency 62
Safety 91
Practicality 60
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance HR-V +1 Efficiency Level Safety HR-V +4 Practicality Kona +7 Ownership Kona +22

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Kona

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 67/100
Ownership 65/100

HR-V

Performance 41/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 60/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Kona leads the specification evidence index with 64 pts vs 60 pts for HR-V

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Kona leads. However, HR-V may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

HR-V
HR-V
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
HR-V vs C5 SHS →
HR-V
HR-V
VS
Destinator
Destinator
HR-V vs Destinator →
HR-V
HR-V
VS
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
HR-V vs Scorpio-N →
HR-V
HR-V
VS
Duster
Duster
HR-V vs Duster →
HR-V
HR-V
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
HR-V vs X70 Plus →
HR-V
HR-V
VS
XUV700
XUV700
HR-V vs XUV700 →
Kona
KonaDiscontinued
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
Kona vs C5 SHS →
Kona
KonaDiscontinued
VS
Destinator
Destinator
Kona vs Destinator →

HR-V vs Kona questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.