Tata Harrier vs Ford Puma

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Ford Puma Discontinued model
Tata Harrier in South Africa

Tata Harrier

Fearless+ DT AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 15.15 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 459,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 16.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Harrier
Fuel Economy Puma
🛡 Safety Harrier
📦 Practicality Harrier
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Recorded price context Harrier: current from ZAR 549,900 · Puma: last listed from ZAR 389,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Harrier Puma
Maximum Power 125 kW @ 3750 rpm 92 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 350 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm 170 Nm
Engine Size 1956 cc 999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 15.15 km/l 16.4 km/l
Ground Clearance 205 mm 170 mm
Boot / Load Bay 445 l 456 l
Airbags 7 8
Kerb Weight 1823 kg 1325 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 5 years / 125,000 km 3

= leads in this spec

Archived vehicles remain available for comparison. Verified specs stay visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Harrier has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Puma remains close.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Harrier +20 pts
Efficiency Puma +5 pts
Safety Harrier +1 pts
Practicality Harrier +6 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Catalogue-index leader

Harrier

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Puma

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Harrier

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Puma

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Harrier Puma
Model Introduced Year 2025 2023
Generation Current-generation South African-market Tata Harrier five-seat SUV First generation Puma in South Africa
Facelift History Introduced with Tata Passenger Vehicles' South African return in 2025; no South African facelift has been announced New model introduced in South Africa
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Not confirmed
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status Active Not confirmed
Segment Mid-size SUV Not confirmed
Vehicle Type Passenger Car Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg - 1325 kg
Spec Harrier Puma
Length 4605 mm 4186 mm
Width 1922 mm 1805 mm
Height 1718 mm 1531 mm
Wheelbase 2741 mm 2594 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 42 l
Boot/Cargo Space 445 l 456 l
Kerb Weight 1823 kg 1325 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2298 kg 1775 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors Not confirmed
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 950 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 840 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 980 mm Not confirmed

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Harrier leads by 10 points

Harrier has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Puma remains close.

Index leader 72 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 75% source coverage
72
#1 Index leader

Harrier

75% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 59
Performance 60
Efficiency 59
Safety 99
Practicality 67
Leads by 10 points
62
#2

Puma

87% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 64
Safety 98
Practicality 61
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Harrier +20 Efficiency Puma +5 Safety Harrier +1 Practicality Harrier +6

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Harrier

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 67/100

Puma

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 64/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 43/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Tata Harrier leads the catalogue index with 72 pts vs 62 pts for Puma

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Harrier leads. However, Puma may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Harrier and Puma comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Harrier 60 vs Puma 40.

Efficiency index: Harrier 59 vs Puma 64.

Safety-equipment index: Harrier 99 vs Puma 98.

Practicality index: Harrier 67 vs Puma 61.

Ownership-cover index: Harrier not separately scored vs Puma 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.