Lexus GX vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Lexus GX in South Africa

Lexus GX

GX 550 Overtrail Petrol Automatic 10-speed
ZAR 1,856,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 260 kW 🔧 650 Nm ⛽ 8.1 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 300

3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 2,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 227 kW 🔧 700 Nm ⛽ 9.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance GX
Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 300
🛡 Safety Land Cruiser 300
📦 Practicality GX
🔑 Ownership GX
Land Cruiser 300 starts ZAR 1856600 cheaper GX from ZAR 1,856,600 · Land Cruiser 300 from ZAR 1,849,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec GX Land Cruiser 300
Engine Power 260 kW 227 kW
Torque 650 Nm 700 Nm
Engine Size 3500 cc 3346 cc
Claimed Mileage 8.1 km/l 9.4 km/l
Ground Clearance 220 mm 235 mm
Boot / Load Bay 1063 l 309 l
Airbags Curtain,Driver,Passenger,Driver Knee,Front Side,Passenger Knee 10
Kerb Weight 2475-2515 kg 2430 kg
Seating Capacity 5 7
Warranty 7 years / 100,000km 3 years / 100 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both GX and Land Cruiser 300 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance GX +1 pts
Efficiency Land Cruiser 300 +6 pts
Safety Land Cruiser 300 +5 pts
Practicality GX +4 pts
Ownership GX +50 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

GX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Land Cruiser 300

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

GX

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Land Cruiser 300

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GX Land Cruiser 300
Model Introduced Year 2025 2021
Generation Third-generation Lexus GX 550 body-on-frame luxury SUV 300-series Land Cruiser on latest LGAA platform
Facelift History All-new GX 550 launched in South Africa in 2025 with Overtrail and SE grades New generation introduced in 2021 with complete redesign
Facelift Launched Since All-new GX 550 launched in South Africa in 2025 with Overtrail and SE grades 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17 Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published published
Segment Luxury SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note - White, Black, Silver, Grey, Dark Blue, Bronze
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.3D VX-R 4x4 Automatic
Spec GX Land Cruiser 300
Ground Clearance 220 mm 235 mm
Wheelbase 2850 mm 2850 mm
Length 5015 mm 4985 mm
Width 2000 mm 1980 mm
Height 1870 mm 1910 mm
Kerb Weight 2475-2515 kg 2430 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight 3110 kg 3300 kg
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 1063 l 309 l
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 3500 kg
Front Track Width 1687 mm 1675 mm
Rear Track Width 1688 mm 1675 mm
Turning Radius 6.0 m 6.0 m
Load Bed Length 1063 l 309 l
Load Bed Width - -
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload 595-635 kg -
Boot Volume 1063 l 309 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 7
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 110 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 3110 kg 3300 kg
Ground Clearance Max 220 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance Min 220 mm 235 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 220 mm 235 mm
Height Mm 1870 mm 1910 mm
Length Mm 5015 mm 4985 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 1063 l 309 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg 595-635 kg -
Cargo Volume 1063 l 309 l
Tare Mass Kg 2475-2515 kg 2430 kg
Turning Circle 6.0 m 6.0 m
Turning Circle M 6.0 m 6.0 m
Width Mm 2000 mm 1980 mm
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded - 309 l

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

GX leads by 6 points

Both GX and Land Cruiser 300 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 82 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 79% confidence
82
#1 Winner

GX

79% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 96 Check Efficiency 34
Performance 96
Efficiency 34
Safety 94
Practicality 85
Ownership 93
Leads by 6 points
76
#2

Land Cruiser 300

89% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 40
Performance 95
Efficiency 40
Safety 99
Practicality 81
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GX +1 Efficiency Land Cruiser 300 +6 Safety Land Cruiser 300 +5 Practicality GX +4 Ownership GX +50

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

GX

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 34/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 85/100
Ownership 93/100

Land Cruiser 300

Performance 95/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 81/100
Ownership 43/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Lexus GX wins with 82 pts vs 76 pts for Land Cruiser 300

In structured scoring, GX emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Land Cruiser 300 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the GX edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: GX 34 vs Land Cruiser 300 40. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: GX 94, Land Cruiser 300 99. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: GX 93, Land Cruiser 300 43. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: GX 85, Land Cruiser 300 81. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: GX 96, Land Cruiser 300 95. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The GX edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The GX scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between GX and Land Cruiser 300 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: GX scores 96 vs 95.

Efficiency: GX scores 34 vs 40.

Safety: GX scores 94 vs 99.

Practicality: GX scores 85 vs 81.

Ownership: GX scores 93 vs 43.

Final structured scoring gives GX the advantage in this comparison.