Hyundai Grand i10 Cargo vs Mitsubishi Outlander

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Hyundai Grand i10 Cargo in South Africa

Hyundai Grand i10 Cargo

1.2 Executive Cargo 4AT Petrol Current
ZAR 299,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 61 kW 🔧 114 Nm ⛽ 16.9 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander

2.5L Exceed CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 819,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Grand i10 Cargo vs Mitsubishi Outlander: the short answer

Outlander has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Grand i10 Cargo remains close.

Grand i10 Cargo starts ZAR 499,495 cheaper Grand i10 Cargo from ZAR 260,500 · Outlander from ZAR 759,995

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Grand i10 Cargo Outlander
Maximum Power Grand i10 Cargo61 kW Outlander135 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Grand i10 Cargo114 Nm Outlander245 Nm @ 3600 rpm
Engine Size Grand i10 Cargo1197 cc Outlander2488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Grand i10 Cargo16.9 km/l Outlander12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance Grand i10 Cargo165 mm Outlander210 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Grand i10 Cargo

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Outlander

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Grand i10 Cargo

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Outlander

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Grand i10 Cargo Outlander
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2022
Generation Current South African Grand i10 Cargo listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Fourth-generation Outlander
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Current 2026 South African specification including Edition 25.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Panel van SUV
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Van Medium seven-seat SUV
Tare Mass Kg 900-950 kg -
Vehicle Type Van Passenger vehicle
Spec Grand i10 Cargo Outlander
Length 3815 mm 4710 mm
Width 1680 mm 1862 mm
Height 1520 mm 1745 mm
Wheelbase 2450 mm 2706 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 165 mm 210 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1210 l 205 l
Kerb Weight Not Officially Disclosed 1690 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 2355 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 665 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 2 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.5 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 986 mm
Rear Headroom Not Applicable 950 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1058 mm
Rear Legroom Not Applicable 1014 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Grand i10 Cargo and Outlander comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Grand i10 Cargo 30 vs Outlander 56.

Efficiency index: Grand i10 Cargo 66 vs Outlander 49.

Safety-equipment index: Grand i10 Cargo 40 vs Outlander 76.

Practicality index: Grand i10 Cargo 64 vs Outlander 64.

Ownership-cover index: Grand i10 Cargo 65 vs Outlander not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Outlander leads by 11 points

Outlander has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Grand i10 Cargo remains close.

Evidence leader 62 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 83% source coverage
62
#1 Evidence leader

Outlander

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 56
Efficiency 49
Safety 76
Practicality 64
Leads by 11 points
51
#2

Grand i10 Cargo

76% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 66 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 66
Safety 40
Practicality 64
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Outlander +26 Efficiency Grand i10 Cargo +17 Safety Outlander +36 Practicality Level

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Outlander

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 64/100

Grand i10 Cargo

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 66/100
Safety 40/100
Practicality 64/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Outlander leads the specification evidence index with 62 pts vs 51 pts for Grand i10 Cargo

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Outlander leads. However, Grand i10 Cargo may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Grand i10 Cargo vs Outlander questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.