Toyota GR86 vs Toyota Rumion

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR86 in South Africa

Toyota GR86

2.4 Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 173 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 10.9 km/l
VS
Toyota Rumion in South Africa

Toyota Rumion

1.5 XS CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 389,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 140 Nm ⛽ 14.7 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR86 vs Toyota Rumion: the short answer

GR86 and Rumion are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Rumion starts ZAR 410,000 cheaper GR86 from ZAR 749,900 · Rumion from ZAR 339,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR86 Rumion
Maximum Power GR86173 kW @ 7000 rpm Rumion77 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque GR86250 Nm @ 3700 rpm Rumion140 Nm @ 4200 rpm
Engine Size GR862387 cc Rumion1496 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GR8610.9 km/l Rumion14.7 km/l
Ground Clearance GR86130 mm Rumion155 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota GR86

2.4 Automatic

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Toyota Rumion

1.5 XS CVT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

GR86

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Rumion

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR86

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Rumion

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR86 Rumion
360 Degree Camera Not Available Not Available
Adaptive Cruise Control Not Available Not Available
Adaptive Cruise Control Not Available Not Available
Around View Monitor Not Available Not Available
Autonomous Emergency Braking Not Available Not Available
Auto Lights Standard Not Available
Auto Wipers Standard Not Available
Blind Spot Monitoring Not Available Not Available
Blind Spot Warning Not Available Not Available
Cruise Control Standard Standard
Driver Fatigue Alert Not Available Not Available
Emergency Braking Not Available Not Available
EV Mode Not Available Not Available
Lane Departure Warning Not Available Not Available
Lane Keep Assist Not Available Not Available
Parking Distance Sensors Rear Rear
Parking Sensor Rear Rear
Parking Sensors Rear Rear
Pre-Collision System Not Available Not Available
Rain Sensor Wipers Standard Not Available
Rear View Camera Standard Standard
Rear Cross Traffic Alert Not Available Not Available
Rear View Camera Standard Standard
Reverse Camera Standard Standard
Reverse Camera Type Standard Standard
Reversing Camera Standard Standard
Surround View Camera Not Available Not Available
Traffic Sign Recognition Not Available Not Available
Rear Parking Sensors Rear Rear
Auto Highbeam Not Available Not Available
Park Assist Not Available Not Available
Forward Collision Warning Not Available Not Available
Spec GR86 Rumion
4WD Engagement Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Hi Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Selector Not Applicable Not Applicable
Automatic Shift Paddles Standard Not Applicable
Axle Layout RWD FWD
Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Differential Type Front Not Available Not Available
Differential Type Rear Not Available Not Available
Drivetrain RWD FWD/
Drivetrain Layout Rear Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Transverse
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Number of Gears 4 5
Gear Shift Type 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters CVT Automatic
Gearbox 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters CVT Automatic
Gearbox Type 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters CVT Automatic
LSD Available Torsen LSD Not Applicable
Low Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters Standard Not Applicable
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Transfer Case Not Applicable Not Applicable
Transfer Case Guard Not Available Not Available
Transmission Speeds 4 5
Transmission Type Automatic Continuously Variable Transmission
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Clutch Type Not Applicable Not Applicable
Gear Shift Indicator Not Applicable Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR86 and Rumion comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR86 67 vs Rumion 32.

Efficiency index: GR86 45 vs Rumion 59.

Safety-equipment index: GR86 96 vs Rumion 87.

Practicality index: GR86 46 vs Rumion 61.

Ownership-cover index: GR86 43 vs Rumion 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

GR86 leads by 4 points

GR86 and Rumion are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 61 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 87% source coverage
61
#1 Evidence leader

GR86

87% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Ownership 43
Performance 67
Efficiency 45
Safety 96
Practicality 46
Ownership 43
Leads by 4 points
57
#2

Rumion

87% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 32
Performance 32
Efficiency 59
Safety 87
Practicality 61
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GR86 +35 Efficiency Rumion +14 Safety GR86 +9 Practicality Rumion +15 Ownership Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

GR86

Performance 67/100
Efficiency 45/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 46/100
Ownership 43/100

Rumion

Performance 32/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota GR86 leads the specification evidence index with 61 pts vs 57 pts for Rumion

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, GR86 leads. However, Rumion may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

GR86 vs Rumion questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.