Mercedes-Benz GLC vs Hyundai H-100 Deck

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mercedes-Benz GLC in South Africa

Mercedes-Benz GLC

GLC 43 4MATIC Petrol Mild Hybrid 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,883,775 ex-showroom
⚡ 310 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
VS
Hyundai H-100 Deck in South Africa

Hyundai H-100 Deck

2.6D Deck Aircon 5MT Diesel Current
ZAR 412,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 58 kW 🔧 167 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mercedes-Benz GLC vs Hyundai H-100 Deck: the short answer

GLC holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over H-100 Deck.

H-100 Deck starts ZAR 657,950 cheaper GLC from ZAR 1,047,850 · H-100 Deck from ZAR 389,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GLC H-100 Deck
Maximum Power GLC310 kW H-100 Deck58 kW
Maximum Torque GLC500 Nm H-100 Deck167 Nm
Engine Size GLC1991 cc H-100 Deck2607 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GLC10.2 km/l H-100 Deck10.2 km/l
Ground Clearance GLC187 mm H-100 Deck185 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mercedes-Benz GLC

GLC 43 4MATIC

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Hyundai H-100 Deck

2.6D Deck Aircon 5MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

GLC

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

H-100 Deck

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

GLC

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

H-100 Deck

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GLC H-100 Deck
Model Introduced Year 2026 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Current South African GLC generation represented by derivative GLC 43 4MATIC Current South African H-100 Deck listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Current-generation/facelift specification; derivative-specific South African configuration Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Current South African model cycle Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Suv Single-cab dropside
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Current South African retail range active
Segment Premium SUV Pickup
Vehicle Type SUV Pickup
Body Type Cab - Pickup
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Tare Mass Kg - 1665 kg
Spec GLC H-100 Deck
Length 4716 mm 4850 mm
Width 1890 mm 1740 mm
Height 1640 mm 1970 mm
Wheelbase 2888 mm 2640 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 187 mm 185 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 220 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 l 65 l
Boot/Cargo Space 620 l -
Kerb Weight 1950 kg 1665 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2000 kg 3015 kg
Payload Capacity 600 kg 1350 kg
Towing Capacity 2000 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.9 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 960 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 960 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 900 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 900 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This GLC and H-100 Deck comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GLC 97 vs H-100 Deck 34.

Efficiency index: GLC 45 vs H-100 Deck 46.

Safety-equipment index: GLC 99 vs H-100 Deck 94.

Practicality index: GLC 73 vs H-100 Deck 58.

Ownership-cover index: GLC not separately scored vs H-100 Deck 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

GLC leads by 22 points

GLC holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over H-100 Deck.

Evidence leader 81 /100
Lead 22 points
Data 83% source coverage
81
#1 Evidence leader

GLC

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 45
Performance 97
Efficiency 45
Safety 99
Practicality 73
Leads by 22 points
59
#2

H-100 Deck

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 46
Safety 94
Practicality 58
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GLC +63 Efficiency H-100 Deck +1 Safety GLC +5 Practicality GLC +15

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

GLC

Performance 97/100
Efficiency 45/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 73/100

H-100 Deck

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mercedes-Benz GLC leads the specification evidence index with 81 pts vs 59 pts for H-100 Deck

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, GLC leads. However, H-100 Deck may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

GLC
GLC
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
GLC vs Land Cruiser FJ →
GLC
GLC
VS
Tunland V9 Double Cab
Tunland V9 Double Cab
GLC vs Tunland V9 Double Cab →
GLC
GLC
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
GLC vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
GLC
GLC
VS
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
GLC vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab →
GLC
GLC
VS
Ranger Sport
Ranger Sport
GLC vs Ranger Sport →
GLC
GLC
VS
E5 Electric
E5 Electric
GLC vs E5 Electric →
H-100 Deck
H-100 Deck
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
H-100 Deck vs Land Cruiser FJ →
H-100 Deck
H-100 Deck
VS
Tunland V9 Double Cab
Tunland V9 Double Cab
H-100 Deck vs Tunland V9 Double Cab →

GLC vs H-100 Deck questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.