Hyundai EXTER vs Mitsubishi Outlander

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Hyundai EXTER in South Africa

Hyundai EXTER

1.2 Elite AMT Two Tone Petrol Current
ZAR 334,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 5 kW 🔧 114 Nm ⛽ 16.9 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander

2.5L Exceed CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 819,995 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai EXTER vs Mitsubishi Outlander: the short answer

EXTER and Outlander are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

EXTER starts ZAR 490,095 cheaper EXTER from ZAR 269,900 · Outlander from ZAR 759,995

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification EXTER Outlander
Maximum Power EXTER5 kW Outlander135 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque EXTER114 Nm Outlander245 Nm @ 3600 rpm
Engine Size EXTER1197 cc Outlander2488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy EXTER16.9 km/l Outlander12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance EXTER185 mm Outlander210 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

EXTER

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Outlander

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

EXTER

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Outlander

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec EXTER Outlander
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2022
Generation Current South African EXTER listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Fourth-generation Outlander
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Current 2026 South African specification including Edition 25.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Compact SUV SUV
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment SUV Medium seven-seat SUV
Tare Mass Kg 999 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Passenger vehicle
Spec EXTER Outlander
Length 3815 mm 4710 mm
Width 1710 mm 1862 mm
Height 1631 mm 1745 mm
Wheelbase 2450 mm 2706 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 185 mm 210 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 391 l 205 l
Kerb Weight 999 kg 1690 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 180 mm
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) - 2355 kg
Payload Capacity - 665 kg
Towing Capacity - 1600 kg
Number of Rows - 3 rows
Minimum Turning Radius - 5.5 m
Front Headroom - 986 mm
Rear Headroom - 950 mm
Front Legroom - 1058 mm
Rear Legroom - 1014 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This EXTER and Outlander comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: EXTER 19 vs Outlander 56.

Efficiency index: EXTER 66 vs Outlander 49.

Safety-equipment index: EXTER 84 vs Outlander 76.

Practicality index: EXTER 65 vs Outlander 64.

Ownership-cover index: EXTER 65 vs Outlander not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Outlander leads by 4 points

EXTER and Outlander are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 62 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 83% source coverage
62
#1 Evidence leader

Outlander

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 56
Efficiency 49
Safety 76
Practicality 64
Leads by 4 points
58
#2

EXTER

77% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 19
Performance 19
Efficiency 66
Safety 84
Practicality 65
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Outlander +37 Efficiency EXTER +17 Safety EXTER +8 Practicality EXTER +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Outlander

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 64/100

EXTER

Performance 19/100
Efficiency 66/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Outlander leads the specification evidence index with 62 pts vs 58 pts for EXTER

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Outlander leads. However, EXTER may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

EXTER vs Outlander questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.