Ford EcoSport vs Ford Puma

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Historical comparison

Every selected record is historical. Verified South African specifications and last-listed prices remain available for owners and used-car shoppers.

Ford EcoSport Discontinued model Ford Puma Discontinued model
Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 395,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 17.2 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 459,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 16.4 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Ford EcoSport vs Ford Puma: the short answer

EcoSport and Puma are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context EcoSport: last listed from ZAR 310,000 · Puma: last listed from ZAR 389,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification EcoSport Puma
Maximum Power EcoSport92 kW Puma92 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque EcoSport170 Nm Puma170 Nm
Engine Size EcoSport998 cc Puma999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy EcoSport17.2 km/l Puma16.4 km/l
Ground Clearance EcoSport200 mm Puma170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

EcoSport

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Puma

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

EcoSport

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Puma

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec EcoSport Puma
Model Introduced Year 2013 2023
Generation Single generation on Ford B2E platform. Produced in India for global markets. SA received the facelift model with improved interior quality and revised safety kit. First generation Puma in South Africa
Facelift History Facelift in 2017 — revised front fascia and SYNC 3 infotainment introduced New model introduced in South Africa
Facelift Launched Since 2017 2021
Facelift Version Ending 2024 2024
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2021 2021
Production Status discontinued discontinued
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1290 kg 1325 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec EcoSport Puma
Length 4325 mm 4186 mm
Width 1765 mm 1805 mm
Height 1653 mm 1531 mm
Wheelbase 2519 mm 2594 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l 42 l
Boot/Cargo Space 352 l 456 l
Kerb Weight 1290 kg 1325 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1740 kg 1775 kg
Payload Capacity 450 kg 450 kg
Towing Capacity 950 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 981 mm
Rear Headroom 953 mm 947 mm
Front Legroom 1032 mm 1047 mm
Rear Legroom 890 mm 898 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This EcoSport and Puma comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: EcoSport 40 vs Puma 40.

Efficiency index: EcoSport 65 vs Puma 64.

Safety-equipment index: EcoSport 92 vs Puma 98.

Practicality index: EcoSport 56 vs Puma 59.

Ownership-cover index: EcoSport 55 vs Puma 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

EcoSport leads by 0 points

EcoSport and Puma are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 61 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 92% source coverage
61
#1 Evidence leader

EcoSport

92% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 65
Safety 92
Practicality 56
Ownership 55
Leads by 0 points
61
#2

Puma

91% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 64
Safety 98
Practicality 59
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Level Efficiency EcoSport +1 Safety Puma +6 Practicality Puma +3 Ownership EcoSport +12

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

EcoSport

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 56/100
Ownership 55/100

Puma

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 64/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 59/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford EcoSport leads the specification evidence index with 61 pts vs 61 pts for Puma

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, EcoSport leads. However, Puma may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

EcoSport vs Puma questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.