Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Lexus RZ

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross in South Africa

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

1.5L GLS Exceed CVT 4x2 Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 620,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
VS
Lexus RZ in South Africa

Lexus RZ

RZ 550e F SPORT Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,977,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 300 kW 🔧 269 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Lexus RZ: the short answer

RZ holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Eclipse Cross.

Eclipse Cross starts ZAR 1,147,610 cheaper Eclipse Cross from ZAR 534,990 · RZ from ZAR 1,682,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Eclipse Cross RZ
Maximum Power Eclipse Cross110 kW @ 5500 rpm RZ300 kW
Maximum Torque Eclipse Cross250 Nm @ 3500 rpm RZ268.6 Nm
Engine Size Eclipse Cross1499 cc RZNot Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy Eclipse Cross13 km/l RZNot Applicable
Ground Clearance Eclipse Cross180 mm RZ200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Eclipse Cross

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

RZ

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Eclipse Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

RZ

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Eclipse Cross RZ
Model Introduced Year 2021 2026
Generation First-generation Eclipse Cross facelift Updated dedicated battery-electric Lexus RZ range launched locally in 2026
Facelift History Current South African facelift specification. 2026 South African range introduces RZ 500e, RZ 550e F SPORT and RZ 600e F SPORT Performance derivatives
Facelift Launched Since Current specification 2026 South African range introduces RZ 500e, RZ 550e F SPORT and RZ 600e F SPORT Performance derivatives
Facelift Version Ending Current Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Compact crossover SUV Luxury SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 2145-2165 kg
Spec Eclipse Cross RZ
Length 4545 mm 4805 mm
Width 1805 mm 1895 mm
Height 1685 mm 1635 mm
Wheelbase 2670 mm 2850 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 155 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 437 l 522 l
Kerb Weight 1490 kg 2180 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2100 kg 2640 kg
Payload Capacity 610 kg 460 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.3 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1003 mm 1013 mm
Rear Headroom 932 mm 1008 mm
Front Legroom 1039 mm 1069 mm
Rear Legroom 943 mm 953 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Eclipse Cross and RZ comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Eclipse Cross 52 vs RZ 83.

Efficiency index: Eclipse Cross 51 vs RZ 90.

Safety-equipment index: Eclipse Cross 76 vs RZ 94.

Practicality index: Eclipse Cross 64 vs RZ 62.

Ownership-cover index: Eclipse Cross not separately scored vs RZ not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RZ leads by 21 points

RZ holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Eclipse Cross.

Evidence leader 82 /100
Lead 21 points
Data 60% source coverage
82
#1 Evidence leader

RZ

60% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Practicality 62
Performance 83
Efficiency 90
Safety 94
Practicality 62
Leads by 21 points
61
#2

Eclipse Cross

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 76 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 52
Efficiency 51
Safety 76
Practicality 64
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance RZ +31 Efficiency RZ +39 Safety RZ +18 Practicality Eclipse Cross +2

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RZ

Performance 83/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 62/100

Eclipse Cross

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 76/100
Practicality 64/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus RZ leads the specification evidence index with 82 pts vs 61 pts for Eclipse Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RZ leads. However, Eclipse Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Eclipse Cross vs RZ questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.