BYD DOLPHIN vs Jetour T2 i-DM

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

BYD DOLPHIN in South Africa

BYD DOLPHIN

Premium Extended Range EV Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 602,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 310 Nm
VS
Jetour T2 i-DM in South Africa

Jetour T2 i-DM

T2 i-DM Plug-in Hybrid 3-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 779,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 100 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ 76.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

BYD DOLPHIN vs Jetour T2 i-DM: the short answer

DOLPHIN and T2 i-DM are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

DOLPHIN starts ZAR 240,000 cheaper DOLPHIN from ZAR 539,900 · T2 i-DM from ZAR 779,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification DOLPHIN T2 i-DM
Maximum Power DOLPHIN150 kW T2 i-DM100 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque DOLPHIN310 Nm T2 i-DM220 Nm @ 2500 rpm
Engine Size DOLPHINNot Applicable T2 i-DM1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy DOLPHINNot Applicable T2 i-DM76.9 km/l
Ground Clearance DOLPHIN155 mm T2 i-DM190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

BYD DOLPHIN

Premium Extended Range EV

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Jetour T2 i-DM

T2 i-DM

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

DOLPHIN

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

T2 i-DM

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

DOLPHIN

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

T2 i-DM

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec DOLPHIN T2 i-DM
Model Introduced Year 2024 2026
Generation First South African DOLPHIN generation Current South African launch specification
Facelift History No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026 Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active Active
Segment Compact Hatchback SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 4038 kg
Tare Mass Kg - 2138 kg
Spec DOLPHIN T2 i-DM
Length 4290 mm 4785 mm
Width 1770 mm 2006 mm
Height 1570 mm 1875 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 130 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 70 l
Boot/Cargo Space 345 l 580 l
Kerb Weight 1658 kg 2138 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2068 kg 2438 kg
Payload Capacity 410 kg 300 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.25 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 900 mm 970 mm
Front Legroom 1130 mm 980 mm
Rear Legroom 740 mm 810 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This DOLPHIN and T2 i-DM comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: DOLPHIN 66 vs T2 i-DM 45.

Efficiency index: DOLPHIN 90 vs T2 i-DM 98.

Safety-equipment index: DOLPHIN 98 vs T2 i-DM 92.

Practicality index: DOLPHIN 56 vs T2 i-DM 66.

Ownership-cover index: DOLPHIN not separately scored vs T2 i-DM not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

DOLPHIN leads by 3 points

DOLPHIN and T2 i-DM are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 64% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

DOLPHIN

64% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Practicality 56
Performance 66
Efficiency 90
Safety 98
Practicality 56
Leads by 3 points
73
#2

T2 i-DM

66% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 98 Check Performance 45
Performance 45
Efficiency 98
Safety 92
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance DOLPHIN +21 Efficiency T2 i-DM +8 Safety DOLPHIN +6 Practicality T2 i-DM +10

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

DOLPHIN

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 56/100

T2 i-DM

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 98/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 66/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BYD DOLPHIN leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 73 pts for T2 i-DM

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, DOLPHIN leads. However, T2 i-DM may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
VS
Sportage
Sportage
DOLPHIN vs Sportage →
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
VS
Tiguan
Tiguan
DOLPHIN vs Tiguan →
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
VS
H7
H7
DOLPHIN vs H7 →
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
DOLPHIN vs T-Roc →
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
VS
03T
03T
DOLPHIN vs 03T →
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
DOLPHIN vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
T2 i-DM
T2 i-DM
VS
Sportage
Sportage
T2 i-DM vs Sportage →
T2 i-DM
T2 i-DM
VS
Tiguan
Tiguan
T2 i-DM vs Tiguan →

DOLPHIN vs T2 i-DM questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.