Mitsubishi Destinator vs Hyundai H-100 Deck

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mitsubishi Destinator in South Africa

Mitsubishi Destinator

Exceed 1.5T CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 569,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
VS
Hyundai H-100 Deck in South Africa

Hyundai H-100 Deck

2.6D Deck Aircon 5MT Diesel Current
ZAR 412,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 58 kW 🔧 167 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mitsubishi Destinator vs Hyundai H-100 Deck: the short answer

Destinator and H-100 Deck are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

H-100 Deck starts ZAR 100,090 cheaper Destinator from ZAR 489,990 · H-100 Deck from ZAR 389,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Destinator H-100 Deck
Maximum Power Destinator120 kW @ 5000 rpm H-100 Deck58 kW
Maximum Torque Destinator250 Nm @ 2500-4000 rpm H-100 Deck167 Nm
Engine Size Destinator1499 cc H-100 Deck2607 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Destinator13.9 km/l H-100 Deck10.2 km/l
Ground Clearance Destinator214 mm H-100 Deck185 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mitsubishi Destinator

Exceed 1.5T CVT

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Hyundai H-100 Deck

2.6D Deck Aircon 5MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Destinator

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

H-100 Deck

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Destinator

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

H-100 Deck

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Destinator H-100 Deck
Model Introduced Year 2026 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation First-generation Destinator Current South African H-100 Deck listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History South African launch specification introduced in March 2026. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Current specification Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Single-cab dropside
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Medium seven-seat SUV Pickup
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Pickup
Body Type Cab - Pickup
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Tare Mass Kg - 1665 kg
Spec Destinator H-100 Deck
Length 4680 mm 4850 mm
Width 1840 mm 1740 mm
Height 1780 mm 1970 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2640 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 214 mm 185 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 185 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 65 l
Boot/Cargo Space 152 l -
Kerb Weight 1500 kg 1665 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2090 kg 3015 kg
Payload Capacity 590 kg 1350 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 3 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 890 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 850 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1055 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 620 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Destinator and H-100 Deck comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Destinator 50 vs H-100 Deck 34.

Efficiency index: Destinator 54 vs H-100 Deck 46.

Safety-equipment index: Destinator 73 vs H-100 Deck 94.

Practicality index: Destinator 63 vs H-100 Deck 58.

Ownership-cover index: Destinator not separately scored vs H-100 Deck 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Destinator leads by 1 points

Destinator and H-100 Deck are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 60 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 79% source coverage
60
#1 Evidence leader

Destinator

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Performance 50
Performance 50
Efficiency 54
Safety 73
Practicality 63
Leads by 1 points
59
#2

H-100 Deck

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 46
Safety 94
Practicality 58
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Destinator +16 Efficiency Destinator +8 Safety H-100 Deck +21 Practicality Destinator +5

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Destinator

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 63/100

H-100 Deck

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Destinator leads the specification evidence index with 60 pts vs 59 pts for H-100 Deck

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Destinator leads. However, H-100 Deck may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Destinator
Destinator
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
Destinator vs Jimny 5-Door →
Destinator
Destinator
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Destinator vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV →
Destinator
Destinator
VS
Dashing
Dashing
Destinator vs Dashing →
Destinator
Destinator
VS
CX-3
CX-3
Destinator vs CX-3 →
Destinator
Destinator
VS
Jimny
Jimny
Destinator vs Jimny →
Destinator
Destinator
VS
Navara Single Cab
Navara Single Cab
Destinator vs Navara Single Cab →
H-100 Deck
H-100 Deck
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
H-100 Deck vs Jimny 5-Door →
H-100 Deck
H-100 Deck
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
H-100 Deck vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV →

Destinator vs H-100 Deck questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.