Mazda CX-60 vs Hyundai Venue Cargo

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Hyundai Venue Cargo in South Africa

Hyundai Venue Cargo

1.2 Premium Cargo MT Petrol Current
ZAR 309,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 61 kW 🔧 114 Nm ⛽ 15.4 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-60 vs Hyundai Venue Cargo: the short answer

CX-60 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Venue Cargo remains close.

Venue Cargo starts ZAR 480,300 cheaper CX-60 from ZAR 790,200 · Venue Cargo from ZAR 309,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-60 Venue Cargo
Maximum Power CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm Venue Cargo61 kW
Maximum Torque CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm Venue Cargo114 Nm
Engine Size CX-602488 cc Venue Cargo1197 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-6013.0 km/l Venue Cargo15.4 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-60178.8 mm Venue Cargo190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-60

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Venue Cargo

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Venue Cargo

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 Venue Cargo
Model Introduced Year 2023 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture Current South African Venue Cargo listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Panel van
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Premium mid-size SUV Van
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Van
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Base grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec CX-60 Venue Cargo
Length 4745 mm 3995 mm
Width 1890 mm 1770 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1617 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 2500 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 178.8 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 45 l
Boot/Cargo Space 477 l 1296 l
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 1250 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2342 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity 872 kg 620 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.85 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 990 mm Not Applicable
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 1 rows
Front Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom - Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-60 and Venue Cargo comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-60 59 vs Venue Cargo 30.

Efficiency index: CX-60 51 vs Venue Cargo 61.

Safety-equipment index: CX-60 98 vs Venue Cargo 89.

Practicality index: CX-60 68 vs Venue Cargo 66.

Ownership-cover index: CX-60 not separately scored vs Venue Cargo 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-60 leads by 9 points

CX-60 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Venue Cargo remains close.

Evidence leader 70 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 81% source coverage
70
#1 Evidence leader

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Leads by 9 points
61
#2

Venue Cargo

70% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 89 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 61
Safety 89
Practicality 66
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-60 +29 Efficiency Venue Cargo +10 Safety CX-60 +9 Practicality CX-60 +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

Venue Cargo

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 89/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-60 leads the specification evidence index with 70 pts vs 61 pts for Venue Cargo

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-60 leads. However, Venue Cargo may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-60
CX-60
VS
Harrier
Harrier
CX-60 vs Harrier →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Hiace Ses'fikile
Hiace Ses'fikile
CX-60 vs Hiace Ses'fikile →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
C7
C7
CX-60 vs C7 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
CX-30
CX-30
CX-60 vs CX-30 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
CX-60 vs Eclipse Cross →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
G10+ Van
G10+ Van
CX-60 vs G10+ Van →
Venue Cargo
Venue Cargo
VS
Harrier
Harrier
Venue Cargo vs Harrier →
Venue Cargo
Venue Cargo
VS
Hiace Ses'fikile
Hiace Ses'fikile
Venue Cargo vs Hiace Ses'fikile →

CX-60 vs Venue Cargo questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.