Mazda CX-60 vs Jetour T1

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol Automatic
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Jetour T1 in South Africa

Jetour T1

Odyssey 2.0TD+7DCT 4WD Petrol Automatic
ZAR 634,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 375 Nm ⛽ 11.1 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance T1
Fuel Economy CX-60
🛡 Safety CX-60
📦 Practicality T1
🔑 Ownership T1
T1 starts ZAR 790200 cheaper CX-60 from ZAR 790,200 · T1 from ZAR 514,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec CX-60 T1
Engine Power 141 kW 180 kW
Torque 261 Nm 375 Nm
Engine Size 2488 cc 1998 cc
Claimed Mileage 13.0 km/l 11.1 km/l
Ground Clearance 178.8 mm 190 mm
Boot / Load Bay 477 l 574 l
Airbags 7 Front, front side, and curtain airbags
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 1656-1811 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 Years/Unlimited km 10-year/1,000,000 km engine warranty

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both CX-60 and T1 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance T1 +18 pts
Efficiency CX-60 +7 pts
Safety CX-60 +5 pts
Practicality T1 +3 pts
Ownership T1 +22 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-60

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

T1

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

T1

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 T1
Model Introduced Year 2023 2026
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture Current local listing
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active Active
Segment Premium mid-size SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-60 T1
Ground Clearance 178.8 mm 190 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 2800 mm
Length 4745 mm 4705 mm
Width 1890 mm 1967 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1840 mm
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 1656-1811 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight 2342 kg 2208 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 477 l 574 l
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1600 kg
Turning Radius 5.85 m -
Load Bed Length 477 l 574 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 990 mm -
Front Shoulder Room 1504 mm -
Rear Shoulder Room 1441 mm -
Boot Space Seats Folded 1148 l 1455 l
Number of Doors 5 -
Max Payload 872 kg -
Boot Volume 477 l 574 l
Doors 5 -
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 70 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2342 kg 2208 kg
Ground Clearance Max 178.8 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance Min 178.8 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 178.8 mm 190 mm
Height Mm 1687.5 mm 1840 mm
Length Mm 4745 mm 4705 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 477 l 574 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg 872 kg -
Cargo Volume 477 l 574 l
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg 1656-1811 kg
Turning Circle 5.85 m -
Turning Circle M 5.85 m -
Width Mm 1890 mm 1967 mm
Front Track Width - 1690 mm
Rear Track Width - 1700 mm
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 3808 kg

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

T1 leads by 6 points

Both CX-60 and T1 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 74 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 78% confidence
74
#1 Winner

T1

78% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 44
Performance 77
Efficiency 44
Safety 94
Practicality 71
Ownership 77
Leads by 6 points
68
#2

CX-60

94% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 99
Practicality 68
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance T1 +18 Efficiency CX-60 +7 Safety CX-60 +5 Practicality T1 +3 Ownership T1 +22

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

T1

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 44/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 71/100
Ownership 77/100

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 68/100
Ownership 55/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Jetour T1 wins with 74 pts vs 68 pts for CX-60

In structured scoring, T1 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, CX-60 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the T1 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: CX-60 51 vs T1 44. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: CX-60 99, T1 94. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: CX-60 55, T1 77. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: CX-60 68, T1 71. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: CX-60 59, T1 77. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The T1 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The T1 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between CX-60 and T1 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CX-60 scores 59 vs 77.

Efficiency: CX-60 scores 51 vs 44.

Safety: CX-60 scores 99 vs 94.

Practicality: CX-60 scores 68 vs 71.

Ownership: CX-60 scores 55 vs 77.

Final structured scoring gives T1 the advantage in this comparison.