Mazda CX-60 vs BMW iX2

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
BMW iX2 in South Africa

BMW iX2

eDrive20 M Sport Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,330,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 250 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-60 vs BMW iX2: the short answer

CX-60 and iX2 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

CX-60 starts ZAR 509,800 cheaper CX-60 from ZAR 790,200 · iX2 from ZAR 1,300,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-60 iX2
Maximum Power CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm iX2150 kW
Maximum Torque CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm iX2250 Nm
Engine Size CX-602488 cc iX2Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy CX-6013.0 km/l iX2Not Applicable
Ground Clearance CX-60178.8 mm iX2190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-60

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

iX2

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

iX2

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 iX2
Model Introduced Year 2023 2024
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture First-generation U10 electric coupé-style compact SUV; current South African offering is eDrive20 only.
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. U10 is the first iX2 generation; the eDrive20 joined the South African range in July 2026.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Premium mid-size SUV Premium SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Car
Spec CX-60 iX2
Length 4745 mm 4554 mm
Width 1890 mm 1845 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 2692 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 178.8 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 477 l 525 l
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 1960 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2342 kg 2460 kg
Payload Capacity 872 kg 575 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.85 m 5.8 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1042 mm
Rear Legroom 990 mm 935 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 170 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1010 mm
Rear Headroom - 982 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-60 and iX2 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-60 59 vs iX2 59.

Efficiency index: CX-60 51 vs iX2 90.

Safety-equipment index: CX-60 98 vs iX2 92.

Practicality index: CX-60 68 vs iX2 63.

Ownership-cover index: CX-60 not separately scored vs iX2 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

iX2 leads by 5 points

CX-60 and iX2 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 69% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

iX2

69% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 59
Performance 59
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 63
Leads by 5 points
70
#2

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Level Efficiency iX2 +39 Safety CX-60 +6 Practicality CX-60 +5

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

iX2

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 63/100

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW iX2 leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 70 pts for CX-60

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, iX2 leads. However, CX-60 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-60
CX-60
VS
GLC
GLC
CX-60 vs GLC →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
CX-60 vs ATTO 8 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
X3
X3
CX-60 vs X3 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
NX
NX
CX-60 vs NX →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Sorento
Sorento
CX-60 vs Sorento →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
C9 SHS
C9 SHS
CX-60 vs C9 SHS →
iX2
iX2
VS
GLC
GLC
iX2 vs GLC →
iX2
iX2
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
iX2 vs ATTO 8 →

CX-60 vs iX2 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.