Mazda CX-30 vs Changan UNI-S

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-30 in South Africa

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 651,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Changan UNI-S in South Africa

Changan UNI-S

1.5T AT CE Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 469,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 300 Nm ⛽ 14.49 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-30 vs Changan UNI-S: the short answer

CX-30 and UNI-S are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

UNI-S starts ZAR 149,900 cheaper CX-30 from ZAR 539,800 · UNI-S from ZAR 389,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-30 UNI-S
Maximum Power CX-30121 kW @ 6000 rpm UNI-S138 kW
Maximum Torque CX-30213 Nm @ 4000 rpm UNI-S300 Nm
Engine Size CX-301998 cc UNI-S1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-3015.2 km/l UNI-S14.49 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-30175 mm UNI-SNot Officially Disclosed

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-30

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

UNI-S

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-30

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

UNI-S

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-30 UNI-S
Model Introduced Year 2021 2026
Generation First-generation DM-series Mazda CX-30 using seventh-generation Mazda architecture First current South African UNI-S retail generation, offered in CS, CL and CE grades.
Facelift History South African editions received a focused technology and equipment update in 2024, including the 10.25-inch display and revised connectivity. No South African facelift has been announced since the UNI-S entered local retail sale in 2026.
Facelift Launched Since 2021 Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Compact crossover Compact SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1340 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Passenger car
Spec CX-30 UNI-S
Length 4395 mm 4539 mm
Width 1795 mm 1865 mm
Height 1540 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase 2655 mm 2656 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 295 l 475 l
Kerb Weight 1340 kg 1505 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1937 kg 1825 kg
Payload Capacity 597 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1200 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.66 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 921 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 167 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom - Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-30 and UNI-S comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-30 49 vs UNI-S 59.

Efficiency index: CX-30 59 vs UNI-S 55.

Safety-equipment index: CX-30 96 vs UNI-S 92.

Practicality index: CX-30 55 vs UNI-S 68.

Ownership-cover index: CX-30 not separately scored vs UNI-S not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

UNI-S leads by 4 points

CX-30 and UNI-S are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 67% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

UNI-S

67% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Efficiency 55
Performance 59
Efficiency 55
Safety 92
Practicality 68
Leads by 4 points
65
#2

CX-30

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 49
Performance 49
Efficiency 59
Safety 96
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance UNI-S +10 Efficiency CX-30 +4 Safety CX-30 +4 Practicality UNI-S +13

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

UNI-S

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 55/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 68/100

CX-30

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Changan UNI-S leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 65 pts for CX-30

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, UNI-S leads. However, CX-30 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CX-30
CX-30
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
CX-30 vs C5 SHS →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
CX-30 vs X70 Plus →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
CX-30 vs Outlander Sport →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
CX-30 vs ATTO 2 DM-i →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Jimny
Jimny
CX-30 vs Jimny →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
CX-3
CX-3
CX-30 vs CX-3 →
UNI-S
UNI-S
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
UNI-S vs C5 SHS →
UNI-S
UNI-S
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
UNI-S vs X70 Plus →

CX-30 vs UNI-S questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.