Mazda CX-30 vs Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-30 in South Africa

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD Petrol Automatic
ZAR 651,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV

PHEV Ultra Plug-In Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 679,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 265 kW 🔧 530 Nm ⛽ 20.4 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

⚡ Performance Tiggo 7 PHEV
⛽ Fuel Economy Tiggo 7 PHEV
🛡 Safety Tiggo 7 PHEV
📦 Practicality Tiggo 7 PHEV
🔑 Ownership Tiggo 7 PHEV
CX-30 starts ZAR 599900 cheaper CX-30 from ZAR 539,800 · Tiggo 7 PHEV from ZAR 599,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec CX-30 Tiggo 7 PHEV
Engine Power 121 kW 265 kW
Torque 213 Nm 530 Nm
Engine Size 1998 cc 1.5 cc
Claimed Mileage 15.2 km/l 20.4 km/l
Ground Clearance 175 mm 162 mm
Boot / Load Bay 295 l 626 l
Airbags 7 Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight 1340 kg 1870 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 Years/Unlimited km 7 Year / 200 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Tiggo 7 PHEV holds a noticeable edge over CX-30, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tiggo 7 PHEV +42 pts
Efficiency Tiggo 7 PHEV +26 pts
Safety Tiggo 7 PHEV +11 pts
Practicality Tiggo 7 PHEV +21 pts
Ownership Tiggo 7 PHEV +14 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-30

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Tiggo 7 PHEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

CX-30

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Tiggo 7 PHEV

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-30 Tiggo 7 PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2021 2026
Generation First-generation DM-series Mazda CX-30 using seventh-generation Mazda architecture Current South Africa Tiggo 7 PHEV range
Facelift History South African editions received a focused technology and equipment update in 2024, including the 10.25-inch display and revised connectivity. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2021 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Compact crossover SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-30 Tiggo 7 PHEV
Ground Clearance 175 mm 162 mm
Wheelbase 2655 mm 2670 mm
Length 4395 mm 4553 mm
Width 1795 mm 1862 mm
Height 1540 mm 1686 mm
Kerb Weight 1340 kg 1870 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight 1937 kg 2310 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 295 l 626 l
Towing Capacity 1200 kg -
Turning Radius 5.7 m -
Load Bed Length 295 l 626 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 921 mm -
Front Shoulder Room 1412 mm -
Rear Shoulder Room 1361 mm -
Boot Space Seats Folded 1200 l 1672 l
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload 597 kg -
Boot Volume 295 l 626 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 60 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 1937 kg 2310 kg
Ground Clearance Max 175 mm 162 mm
Ground Clearance Min 175 mm 162 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 175 mm 162 mm
Height Mm 1540 mm 1686 mm
Length Mm 4395 mm 4553 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 295 l 626 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg 597 kg -
Cargo Volume 295 l 626 l
Tare Mass Kg 1340 kg 1870 kg
Turning Circle 5.7 m -
Turning Circle M 5.7 m -
Width Mm 1795 mm 1862 mm
Front Track Width - 1570 mm
Rear Track Width - 1570 mm
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tiggo 7 PHEV leads by 24 points

Tiggo 7 PHEV holds a noticeable edge over CX-30, especially in key ownership areas.

Winner 84 /100
Lead 24 points
Data 74% confidence
84
#1 Winner

Tiggo 7 PHEV

74% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Ownership 69
Performance 91
Efficiency 85
Safety 94
Practicality 76
Ownership 69
Leads by 24 points
60
#2

CX-30

94% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 83 Check Performance 49
Performance 49
Efficiency 59
Safety 83
Practicality 55
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 7 PHEV +42 Efficiency Tiggo 7 PHEV +26 Safety Tiggo 7 PHEV +11 Practicality Tiggo 7 PHEV +21 Ownership Tiggo 7 PHEV +14

Moderate difference between the models.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tiggo 7 PHEV

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 85/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 69/100

CX-30

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 83/100
Practicality 55/100
Ownership 55/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV wins with 84 pts vs 60 pts for CX-30

In structured scoring, Tiggo 7 PHEV emerges as the stronger overall package. However, CX-30 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Other Comparisons Worth Checking

See how similar cars go head-to-head — you might find a better fit than you expected.

CX-30
CX-30
VS
T2
T2
CX-30 vs T2 →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
CX-5
CX-5
CX-30 vs CX-5 →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tucson
Tucson
CX-30 vs Tucson →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
H6
H6
CX-30 vs H6 →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Territory
Territory
CX-30 vs Territory →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
C7
C7
CX-30 vs C7 →
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
VS
T2
T2
Tiggo 7 PHEV vs T2 →
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
VS
CX-5
CX-5
Tiggo 7 PHEV vs CX-5 →

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
CX-30 vs Tiggo 4 Cross →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
CX-30 vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tiggo 4 Pro
Tiggo 4 Pro
CX-30 vs Tiggo 4 Pro →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
CX-30 vs Tiggo 7 →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
CX-30 vs Tiggo 7 Pro →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
CX-30 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tiggo 7 PHEV edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: CX-30 59 vs Tiggo 7 PHEV 85. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: CX-30 83, Tiggo 7 PHEV 94. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: CX-30 55, Tiggo 7 PHEV 69. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: CX-30 55, Tiggo 7 PHEV 76. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: CX-30 49, Tiggo 7 PHEV 91. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tiggo 7 PHEV edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tiggo 7 PHEV scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between CX-30 and Tiggo 7 PHEV in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CX-30 scores 49 vs 91.

Efficiency: CX-30 scores 59 vs 85.

Safety: CX-30 scores 83 vs 94.

Practicality: CX-30 scores 55 vs 76.

Ownership: CX-30 scores 55 vs 69.

Final structured scoring gives Tiggo 7 PHEV the advantage in this comparison.