Mazda CX-30 vs GWM Jolion Pro

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-30 in South Africa

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 651,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
GWM Jolion Pro in South Africa

GWM Jolion Pro

1.5T Pro Ultra Luxury 7DCT Petrol Current
ZAR 466,450 ex-showroom
⚡ 105 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-30 vs GWM Jolion Pro: the short answer

CX-30 and Jolion Pro are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Jolion Pro starts ZAR 147,650 cheaper CX-30 from ZAR 539,800 · Jolion Pro from ZAR 392,150

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-30 Jolion Pro
Maximum Power CX-30121 kW @ 6000 rpm Jolion Pro105 kW
Maximum Torque CX-30213 Nm @ 4000 rpm Jolion Pro210 Nm
Engine Size CX-301998 cc Jolion Pro1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-3015.2 km/l Jolion Pro12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-30175 mm Jolion Pro168 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-30

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Jolion Pro

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-30

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Jolion Pro

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-30 Jolion Pro
Model Introduced Year 2021 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation First-generation DM-series Mazda CX-30 using seventh-generation Mazda architecture Current South African Jolion Pro listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History South African editions received a focused technology and equipment update in 2024, including the 10.25-inch display and revised connectivity. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2021 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active published
Segment Compact crossover SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1340 kg 1376-1540 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec CX-30 Jolion Pro
Length 4395 mm 4472 mm
Width 1795 mm 1841 mm
Height 1540 mm 1619 mm
Wheelbase 2655 mm 2700 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm 168 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 295 l -
Kerb Weight 1340 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1937 kg -
Payload Capacity 597 kg -
Towing Capacity 1200 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 921 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-30 and Jolion Pro comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-30 49 vs Jolion Pro 45.

Efficiency index: CX-30 59 vs Jolion Pro 51.

Safety-equipment index: CX-30 96 vs Jolion Pro 88.

Practicality index: CX-30 55 vs Jolion Pro 65.

Ownership-cover index: CX-30 not separately scored vs Jolion Pro 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-30 leads by 2 points

CX-30 and Jolion Pro are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 65 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 78% source coverage
65
#1 Evidence leader

CX-30

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 49
Performance 49
Efficiency 59
Safety 96
Practicality 55
Leads by 2 points
63
#2

Jolion Pro

60% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 45
Performance 45
Efficiency 51
Safety 88
Practicality 65
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-30 +4 Efficiency CX-30 +8 Safety CX-30 +8 Practicality Jolion Pro +10

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-30

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 55/100

Jolion Pro

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-30 leads the specification evidence index with 65 pts vs 63 pts for Jolion Pro

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-30 leads. However, Jolion Pro may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CX-30
CX-30
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
CX-30 vs C5 SHS →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
CX-30 vs X70 Plus →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
CX-30 vs Outlander Sport →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
ATTO 2 DM-i
ATTO 2 DM-i
CX-30 vs ATTO 2 DM-i →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Jimny
Jimny
CX-30 vs Jimny →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
HR-V
HR-V
CX-30 vs HR-V →
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
Jolion Pro vs C5 SHS →
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
Jolion Pro vs X70 Plus →

CX-30 vs Jolion Pro questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.