Mazda CX-30 vs BYD DOLPHIN

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-30 in South Africa

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 651,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
BYD DOLPHIN in South Africa

BYD DOLPHIN

Premium Extended Range EV Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 602,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 310 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-30 vs BYD DOLPHIN: the short answer

DOLPHIN has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-30 remains close.

CX-30 starts ZAR 100 cheaper CX-30 from ZAR 539,800 · DOLPHIN from ZAR 539,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-30 DOLPHIN
Maximum Power CX-30121 kW @ 6000 rpm DOLPHIN150 kW
Maximum Torque CX-30213 Nm @ 4000 rpm DOLPHIN310 Nm
Engine Size CX-301998 cc DOLPHINNot Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy CX-3015.2 km/l DOLPHINNot Applicable
Ground Clearance CX-30175 mm DOLPHIN155 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

BYD DOLPHIN

Premium Extended Range EV

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-30

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

DOLPHIN

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-30

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

DOLPHIN

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-30 DOLPHIN
Model Introduced Year 2021 2024
Generation First-generation DM-series Mazda CX-30 using seventh-generation Mazda architecture First South African DOLPHIN generation
Facelift History South African editions received a focused technology and equipment update in 2024, including the 10.25-inch display and revised connectivity. No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026
Facelift Launched Since 2021 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Hatchback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active Active
Segment Compact crossover Compact Hatchback
Tare Mass Kg 1340 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV Passenger vehicle
Spec CX-30 DOLPHIN
Length 4395 mm 4290 mm
Width 1795 mm 1770 mm
Height 1540 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase 2655 mm 2700 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 295 l 345 l
Kerb Weight 1340 kg 1658 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1937 kg 2068 kg
Payload Capacity 597 kg 410 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.25 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1130 mm
Rear Legroom 921 mm 740 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 130 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1000 mm
Rear Headroom - 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-30 and DOLPHIN comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-30 49 vs DOLPHIN 66.

Efficiency index: CX-30 59 vs DOLPHIN 90.

Safety-equipment index: CX-30 96 vs DOLPHIN 98.

Practicality index: CX-30 55 vs DOLPHIN 56.

Ownership-cover index: CX-30 not separately scored vs DOLPHIN not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

DOLPHIN leads by 11 points

DOLPHIN has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-30 remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 64% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

DOLPHIN

64% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Practicality 56
Performance 66
Efficiency 90
Safety 98
Practicality 56
Leads by 11 points
65
#2

CX-30

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 49
Performance 49
Efficiency 59
Safety 96
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance DOLPHIN +17 Efficiency DOLPHIN +31 Safety DOLPHIN +2 Practicality DOLPHIN +1

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

DOLPHIN

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 56/100

CX-30

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BYD DOLPHIN leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 65 pts for CX-30

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, DOLPHIN leads. However, CX-30 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-30
CX-30
VS
C7
C7
CX-30 vs C7 →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
CX-30 vs Eclipse Cross →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Territory
Territory
CX-30 vs Territory →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro
Tiggo 8 Pro
CX-30 vs Tiggo 8 Pro →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Harrier
Harrier
CX-30 vs Harrier →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
J7
J7
CX-30 vs J7 →
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
VS
C7
C7
DOLPHIN vs C7 →
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
VS
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
DOLPHIN vs Eclipse Cross →

CX-30 vs DOLPHIN questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.