Mazda CX-3 vs Volkswagen Transporter Vans

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-3 in South Africa

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 551,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 206 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
VS
Volkswagen Transporter Vans in South Africa

Volkswagen Transporter Vans

2.0 TDI 8AT Diesel Current
ZAR 804,100 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 360 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-3 vs Volkswagen Transporter Vans: the short answer

Compare the available model information below. Hagalu has withheld a ranked verdict because the selected vehicles do not yet meet the minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold.

CX-3 starts ZAR 336,500 cheaper CX-3 from ZAR 440,000 · Transporter Vans from ZAR 776,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-3 Transporter Vans
Maximum Power CX-3115 kW @ 6000 rpm Transporter Vans110 kW
Maximum Torque CX-3206 Nm @ 2800 rpm Transporter Vans360 Nm
Engine Size CX-31998 cc Transporter Vans1968 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-315.9 km/l Transporter Vans13.2 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-3155 mm Transporter Vans150 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-3 Transporter Vans
Model Introduced Year 2015 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Current first-generation DK-series Mazda CX-3 Current South African Transporter Vans listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History The CX-3 has received successive equipment and design updates since its 2015 debut; Carbon and Individual now sit together at the top of the South African range. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2015 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Van
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active published
Segment Compact crossover Van
Tare Mass Kg 1270 kg 1900 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Van
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - 4x2 configuration for the local line-up
Spec CX-3 Transporter Vans
Length 4275 mm 5050 mm
Width 1765 mm 2032 mm
Height 1542 mm 1975 mm
Wheelbase 2570 mm 3100 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 155 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 230 l -
Kerb Weight 1270 kg 1900 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1735 kg -
Payload Capacity 465 kg -
Towing Capacity 850 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 3 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 888 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-3 and Transporter Vans comparison brings together local model information and available derivatives for South Africa. Prices and specifications appear only where they have been recorded for this market.

Hagalu has withheld an overall score because at least one selected vehicle does not yet have four comparable categories and 50% weighted source coverage. Missing catalogue evidence is not replaced with a neutral score or a guessed value.

Use the key-spec and full-spec tables to compare the fields that are confirmed. For a purchase decision, verify current availability, exact derivative equipment, finance, insurance and ownership cover with the relevant manufacturer or authorised retailer.

Specification Score Withheld

Hagalu does not turn missing specifications into neutral scores or guessed values.

Fail closed

Score withheld: fewer than four comparable categories or less than 50% weighted source coverage for at least one vehicle.

Use the verified key-spec and full-spec tables on this page. A ranked index will appear only after every selected vehicle has source-backed data in at least four categories and reaches 50% weighted coverage.

What the evidence means

No overall winner is declared because the selected vehicles do not yet meet Hagalu's minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold. Compare the confirmed rows and verify the exact derivative before buying.

CX-3 vs Transporter Vans questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.