Hyundai Creta vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai Creta Discontinued model
Hyundai Creta in South Africa

Hyundai Creta

1.5 IVT Fluid Petrol Discontinued model
ZAR 456,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 144 Nm ⛽ 16.8 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Pajero Sport

2.4L DI-DC 8-speed A/T 4X4 Exceed Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 904,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 133 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Creta vs Mitsubishi Pajero Sport: the short answer

Creta and Pajero Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context Creta: last listed from ZAR 407,900 · Pajero Sport: current from ZAR 789,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Creta Pajero Sport
Maximum Power Creta85 kW @ 6300 rpm Pajero Sport133 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque Creta144 Nm @ 4500 rpm Pajero Sport430 Nm @ 2500 rpm
Engine Size Creta1497 cc Pajero Sport2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Creta16.8 km/l Pajero Sport12.3 km/l
Ground Clearance Creta200 mm Pajero Sport218 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai Creta 1.5 IVT Fluid

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Creta

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Pajero Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Creta

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Pajero Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Creta Pajero Sport
Model Introduced Year 2016 2017
Generation Second generation Creta built on Hyundai's i-GMP platform; the SA model is a popular variant shared with several emerging markets Third-generation Pajero Sport, 2025 facelift
Facelift History Second generation arrived in SA in 2021 with significant upgrades to interior quality, safety tech, and engine options; notably improved over the first-gen car South African facelift launched in May 2025.
Facelift Launched Since 2021 Current specification
Tare Mass Kg 1365 kg -
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed SUV
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed Seven-seat ladder-frame SUV
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Passenger vehicle
Spec Creta Pajero Sport
Length 4330 mm 4825 mm
Width 1790 mm 1815 mm
Height 1635 mm 1805 mm
Wheelbase 2610 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 218 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 68 l
Boot/Cargo Space 433 l 193 l
Kerb Weight 1365 kg 2080 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1860 kg 2775 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.3 m 5.6 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not confirmed 190 mm
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 695 kg
Towing Capacity Not confirmed 2850 kg
Number of Rows Not confirmed 3 rows
Front Headroom Not confirmed 1022 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed 957 mm
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1067 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed 880 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Creta and Pajero Sport comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Creta 36 vs Pajero Sport 65.

Efficiency index: Creta 65 vs Pajero Sport 49.

Safety-equipment index: Creta 87 vs Pajero Sport 72.

Practicality index: Creta 69 vs Pajero Sport 71.

Ownership-cover index: Creta 65 vs Pajero Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Pajero Sport leads by 1 points

Creta and Pajero Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 65 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 83% source coverage
65
#1 Evidence leader

Pajero Sport

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 72 Check Efficiency 49
Performance 65
Efficiency 49
Safety 72
Practicality 71
Leads by 1 points
64
#2

Creta

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 65
Safety 87
Practicality 69
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Pajero Sport +29 Efficiency Creta +16 Safety Creta +15 Practicality Pajero Sport +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Pajero Sport

Performance 65/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 72/100
Practicality 71/100

Creta

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 69/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Pajero Sport leads the specification evidence index with 65 pts vs 64 pts for Creta

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Pajero Sport leads. However, Creta may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Creta vs Pajero Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.