Honda CR-V vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW 🔧 335 Nm ⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

4.0 V6 Single Cab MT Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 780,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda CR-V vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab: the short answer

CR-V has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab remains close.

CR-V starts ZAR 16,300 cheaper CR-V from ZAR 689,900 · Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab from ZAR 706,200

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CR-V Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Maximum Power CR-V204 kW Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab202 kW
Maximum Torque CR-V335 Nm Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab381 Nm
Engine Size CR-V1993 cc Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab3956 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CR-V20 km/l Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab13 km/l
Ground Clearance CR-V198 mm Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab235 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Toyota Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

4.0 V6 Single Cab MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CR-V

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CR-V

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CR-V Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Wheelbase 2700 mm 3085 mm
Length 4690 mm 5275 mm
Width 1860 mm 1855 mm
Height 1690 mm 1855 mm
Kerb Weight 1750 kg 1850 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 2800 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 3 seats
Boot/Cargo Space 497 l 488 l
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 3500 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 l 87 l
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 198 mm 125 mm
Payload Capacity 500 kg 950 kg
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 6.4 m
Front Headroom 970 mm 997 mm
Rear Headroom 970 mm 944 mm
Front Legroom 1049 mm 1037 mm
Rear Legroom 1041 mm 884 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 198 mm 235 mm
Spec CR-V Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab
Gearbox eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Manual
Drivetrain Layout All Wheel Drive 4WD Part-Time
LSD Available Electronic AWD Control Standard
Transfer Case Not Applicable Standard
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Gearbox Type eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Manual
Gear Shift Type eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Manual
Drivetrain AWD 4WD/
Axle Layout AWD 4WD
Differential Lock Electronic AWD Lock Not Applicable
4WD Engagement Available Available
4WD Hi Range Available Available
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Number of Gears Not Applicable 5
Transmission Speeds Not Applicable 5
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Available where 4WD low range is fitted
4WD Selector Not Applicable Confirmed 4WD derivative
Low Range Not Applicable Available where 4WD low range is fitted
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters Not Applicable No
Automatic Shift Paddles Not Applicable No
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Clutch Type Not Applicable Not Applicable
Gear Shift Indicator Not Applicable Not Applicable
Drive Mode Selector - 4WD/off-road drive mode support

In depth: how these cars differ

This CR-V and Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CR-V 77 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 78.

Efficiency index: CR-V 80 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 49.

Safety-equipment index: CR-V 91 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 50.

Practicality index: CR-V 66 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 78.

Ownership-cover index: CR-V 60 vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CR-V leads by 14 points

CR-V has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 14 points
Data 94% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

CR-V

94% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Ownership 60
Performance 77
Efficiency 80
Safety 91
Practicality 66
Ownership 60
Leads by 14 points
62
#2

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

86% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 78 Check Ownership 43
Performance 78
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 78
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab +1 Efficiency CR-V +31 Safety CR-V +41 Practicality Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab +12 Ownership CR-V +17

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CR-V

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 80/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 60/100

Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

Performance 78/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 78/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Honda CR-V leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 62 pts for Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CR-V leads. However, Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

CR-V vs Land Cruiser 79 Single Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.