Honda CR-V vs Toyota GR86

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW 🔧 335 Nm ⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Toyota GR86 in South Africa

Toyota GR86

2.4 Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 173 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 10.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda CR-V vs Toyota GR86: the short answer

CR-V holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over GR86.

CR-V starts ZAR 60,000 cheaper CR-V from ZAR 689,900 · GR86 from ZAR 749,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CR-V GR86
Maximum Power CR-V204 kW GR86173 kW @ 7000 rpm
Maximum Torque CR-V335 Nm GR86250 Nm @ 3700 rpm
Engine Size CR-V1993 cc GR862387 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CR-V20 km/l GR8610.9 km/l
Ground Clearance CR-V198 mm GR86130 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Toyota GR86

2.4 Automatic

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CR-V

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

GR86

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

CR-V

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

GR86

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CR-V GR86
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2575 mm
Length 4690 mm 4265 mm
Width 1860 mm 1775 mm
Height 1690 mm 1310 mm
Kerb Weight 1750 kg 1270 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 1660 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 4 seats
Boot/Cargo Space 497 l 237 l
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1600 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 l 50 l
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 198 mm 125 mm
Payload Capacity 500 kg 390 kg
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 970 mm 998 mm
Rear Headroom 970 mm 958 mm
Front Legroom 1049 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 1041 mm 891 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 198 mm 130 mm
Spec CR-V GR86
Gearbox eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters
Drivetrain Layout All Wheel Drive Rear Wheel Drive
LSD Available Electronic AWD Control Torsen LSD
Transfer Case Not Applicable Not Applicable
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox Type eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters
Gear Shift Type eCVT Automatic 6-Speed Automatic with Paddle Shifters
Drivetrain AWD RWD
Axle Layout AWD RWD
Differential Lock Electronic AWD Lock Not Applicable
4WD Engagement Available Not Applicable
4WD Hi Range Available Not Applicable
Low Range Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Number of Gears Not Applicable 4
Transmission Speeds Not Applicable 4
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
4WD Selector Not Applicable Not Applicable
Low Range Not Applicable Not Applicable
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters Not Applicable Standard
Automatic Shift Paddles Not Applicable Standard
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable Not Applicable
Clutch Type Not Applicable Not Applicable
Gear Shift Indicator Not Applicable Not Applicable
Differential Type Front - Not Available
Differential Type Rear - Not Available
Engine Position - Front Longitudinal
Transfer Case Guard - Not Available

In depth: how these cars differ

This CR-V and GR86 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CR-V 77 vs GR86 67.

Efficiency index: CR-V 80 vs GR86 45.

Safety-equipment index: CR-V 91 vs GR86 96.

Practicality index: CR-V 66 vs GR86 46.

Ownership-cover index: CR-V 60 vs GR86 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CR-V leads by 15 points

CR-V holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over GR86.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 94% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

CR-V

94% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Ownership 60
Performance 77
Efficiency 80
Safety 91
Practicality 66
Ownership 60
Leads by 15 points
61
#2

GR86

87% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Ownership 43
Performance 67
Efficiency 45
Safety 96
Practicality 46
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CR-V +10 Efficiency CR-V +35 Safety GR86 +5 Practicality CR-V +20 Ownership CR-V +17

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CR-V

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 80/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 60/100

GR86

Performance 67/100
Efficiency 45/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 46/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Honda CR-V leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 61 pts for GR86

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CR-V leads. However, GR86 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CR-V
CR-V
VS
Civic RS
Civic RS
CR-V vs Civic RS →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
2 Series Gran Coupé
2 Series Gran Coupé
CR-V vs 2 Series Gran Coupé →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
CR-V vs Land Cruiser FJ →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
CR-V vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
E5 Electric
E5 Electric
CR-V vs E5 Electric →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
CR-V vs ATTO 3 →
GR86
GR86
VS
Civic RS
Civic RS
GR86 vs Civic RS →
GR86
GR86
VS
2 Series Gran Coupé
2 Series Gran Coupé
GR86 vs 2 Series Gran Coupé →

CR-V vs GR86 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.