Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-30

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW 🔧 335 Nm ⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-30 in South Africa

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 651,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-30: the short answer

CR-V has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-30 remains close.

CX-30 starts ZAR 150,100 cheaper CR-V from ZAR 689,900 · CX-30 from ZAR 539,800

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CR-V CX-30
Maximum Power CR-V204 kW CX-30121 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque CR-V335 Nm CX-30213 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size CR-V1993 cc CX-301998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CR-V20 km/l CX-3015.2 km/l
Ground Clearance CR-V198 mm CX-30175 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CR-V

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

CX-30

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

CR-V

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

CX-30

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CR-V CX-30
Model Introduced Year 2023 2021
Generation Built on Honda’s global SUV platform with focus on comfort and safety First-generation DM-series Mazda CX-30 using seventh-generation Mazda architecture
Facelift History Latest generation introduced with improved design, features, and safety technology South African editions received a focused technology and equipment update in 2024, including the 10.25-inch display and revised connectivity.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment SUV Compact crossover
Tare Mass Kg 1750 kg 1340 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CR-V CX-30
Length 4690 mm 4395 mm
Width 1860 mm 1795 mm
Height 1690 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2655 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 198 mm 175 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 198 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 497 l 295 l
Kerb Weight 1750 kg 1340 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 1937 kg
Payload Capacity 500 kg 597 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 970 mm -
Rear Headroom 970 mm -
Front Legroom 1049 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 1041 mm 921 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CR-V and CX-30 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CR-V 77 vs CX-30 49.

Efficiency index: CR-V 80 vs CX-30 59.

Safety-equipment index: CR-V 91 vs CX-30 96.

Practicality index: CR-V 66 vs CX-30 55.

Ownership-cover index: CR-V 60 vs CX-30 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CR-V leads by 11 points

CR-V has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-30 remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 94% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

CR-V

94% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Ownership 60
Performance 77
Efficiency 80
Safety 91
Practicality 66
Ownership 60
Leads by 11 points
65
#2

CX-30

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 49
Performance 49
Efficiency 59
Safety 96
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CR-V +28 Efficiency CR-V +21 Safety CX-30 +5 Practicality CR-V +11

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CR-V

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 80/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 60/100

CX-30

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Honda CR-V leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 65 pts for CX-30

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CR-V leads. However, CX-30 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CR-V
CR-V
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
CR-V vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
CR-V vs E5 EM-i →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
CR-V vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
H6
H6
CR-V vs H6 →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
03T
03T
CR-V vs 03T →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
CR-V vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
CX-30 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
CX-30
CX-30
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
CX-30 vs E5 EM-i →

CR-V vs CX-30 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.